Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11, No. 4, November 2026 (Article in Progress)
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 11, No. 4, November 2026 (Article in Progress)

Issue Published : Sep 1, 2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Deep Learning–Based ASD Detection from EEG Signals: A Comparison of InceptionTime and XceptionTime Architectures

Rachmawati Rachmawati
Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe
Arsy Febrina Dewi
Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe
Melinda Melinda
Universitas Syiah Kuala
Razita Nadhira
Universitas Syiah Kuala
Aufa Rafiki
Universitas Syiah Kuala
Nurlida Basir
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

Corresponding Author(s) : Rachmawati Rachmawati

rachma@pnl.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 11, No. 4, November 2026 (Article in Progress)
Article Published : Sep 1, 2026

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent social-communication impairments and restricted or repetitive behaviors. While clinical assessment remains the diagnostic gold standard, the demand for objective and scalable screening tools has motivated EEG-based automated classification. However, under controlled experimental settings, the relative contributions of preprocessing choices and deep learning architecture selection to ASD detection performance remain insufficiently quantified. This study systematically benchmarks artifact-aware preprocessing and model architecture by comparing InceptionTime and XceptionTime across four end-to-end processing schemes that isolate the effects of independent component analysis (ICA) and classifier design under identical segmentation and evaluation protocols. A public King Abdulaziz University EEG dataset comprising 16 subjects (8 ASD, 8 controls) was used. Signals were bandpass-filtered using a fourth-order Butterworth filter (0.5–45 Hz), optionally denoised via ICA, and segmented into 4-s windows with 50% overlap. Models were evaluated using 8-fold subject-wise cross-validation. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, and statistical significance was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Butterworth+ICA+InceptionTime pipeline achieved the best results, with a mean accuracy of 0.9886 ± 0.0046 and an F1-score of 0.9879 ± 0.0049. ICA inclusion and architecture choice yielded significant improvements in accuracy (  for both, ). These findings indicate that structured artifact suppression and multi-scale temporal modeling jointly enhance EEG-based ASD classification, supporting their use in robust clinically oriented screening systems.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder Electroencephalography Artifact Removal InceptionTime XceptionTime
Rachmawati, R., Arsy Febrina Dewi, Melinda, M., Razita Nadhira, Aufa Rafiki, & Nurlida Basir. (2026). Deep Learning–Based ASD Detection from EEG Signals: A Comparison of InceptionTime and XceptionTime Architectures . Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 11(4). Retrieved from https://kinetik.umm.ac.id/index.php/kinetik/article/view/2785
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Zeidan et al., “Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update,” May 01, 2022, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/aur.2696.
  2. H. A. Hatim, Z. A. A. Alyasseri, and N. Jamil, “A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning,” Artificial Intelligence Review 2025 58:10, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 313-, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x.
  3. J. Li et al., “Identification of autism spectrum disorder based on electroencephalography: A systematic review,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 170, p. 108075, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108075.
  4. S. Das et al., “Machine learning approaches for electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography analyses in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review,” Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 123, p. 110705, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110705.
  5. A. Chaddad, Y. Wu, R. Kateb, and A. Bouridane, “Electroencephalography Signal Processing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Methods and Techniques,” Jul. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/s23146434.
  6. W. Mumtaz, S. Rasheed, and A. Irfan, “Selecting methods for a modular EEG pre-processing pipeline: An objective comparison,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 90, p. 105830, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102741.
  7. C. H. Chuang, K. Y. Chang, C. S. Huang, and T. P. Jung, “IC-U-Net: A U-Net-based Denoising Autoencoder Using Mixtures of Independent Components for Automatic EEG Artifact Removal,” Neuroimage, vol. 263, p. 119586, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119586.
  8. B. Kalita, N. Deb, and D. Das, “AnEEG: leveraging deep learning for effective artifact removal in EEG data,” Scientific Reports 2024 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 24234-, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75091-z.
  9. M. Melinda et al., “Heavy–Light Soft-Vote Fusion of EEG Heatmaps for Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection,” Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 409–429, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.35882/jeeemi.v8i1.1377.
  10. Y. Xu, Z. Yu, Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Li, and Y. Wang, “Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis with EEG signals using time series maps of brain functional connectivity and a combined CNN–LSTM model,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 250, p. 108196, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108196.
  11. S. Y. Ke et al., “Classification of autism spectrum disorder using electroencephalography in Chinese children: a cross-sectional retrospective study.,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 18, p. 1330556, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1330556.
  12. L. Shi et al., “TFSNet: A Time–Frequency Synergy Network Based on EEG Signals for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification,” Brain Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070684.
  13. S. Alhassan, A. Soudani, and M. Almusallam, “Energy-Efficient EEG-Based Scheme for Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection Using Wearable Sensors,” Sensors 2023, Vol. 23, vol. 23, no. 4, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23042228.
  14. M. Melinda, F. Arnia, A. Yafi, N. Afny, C. Andryani, and K. A. Enriko, “Design and Implementation of Mobile Application for CNN-Based EEG Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder,” vol. 14, no. 1, 2024.
  15. F. Abedinzadeh Torghabeh, Y. Modaresnia, and M. H. Moattar, “Hybrid deep transfer learning-based early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using scalogram representation of electroencephalography signals,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2023 62:2, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 495–503, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02959-z.
  16. A. Rafiki et al., “Implementation of Vision Transformer for Early Detection of Autism Based on EEG Signal Heatmap Visualization,” Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2025.
  17. D. Nhu et al., “Automated interictal epileptiform discharge detection from scalp EEG using scalable time-series classification approaches,” Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 2350001, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1142/S0129065723500016.
  18. A. Brenner et al., “Concept-based AI interpretability in physiological time-series data: Example of abnormality detection in electroencephalography,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 257, no. 1, p. 108448, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108448.
  19. N. Khaleghi et al., “EEG-based functional connectivity analysis of brain abnormalities: A systematic review study,” Inform. Med. Unlocked, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 101476, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2024.101476.
  20. M. Elbattah, O. Ali Sadek Ibrahim, and G. Dequen, “Editorial: Improving autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using machine learning techniques,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics , vol. 18, p. 1529839, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1529839.
  21. A. Shaikh, A. Koli, P. Awubaigol, S. Mali, R. Khanai, and P. Akkasaligar, “Artificial Intelligence for Autism Detection Using EEG Signals and Lightweight Neural Networks,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1668 LNNS, pp. 231–242, 2026, doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-07735-6_20.
  22. I. Nafisah et al., “Deep learning-based feature selection for detection of autism spectrum disorder,” Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 8, p. 1594372, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1594372.
  23. M. Z. Uddin, M. A. Shahriar, M. N. Mahamood, F. Alnajjar, M. I. Pramanik, and M. A. R. Ahad, “Deep learning with image-based autism spectrum disorder analysis: A systematic review,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 127, p. 107185, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107185.
  24. M. J. Alhaddad et al., “Diagnosis Autism by Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis FLDA via EEG,” 2012.
  25. M. Murias, S. J. Webb, J. Greenson, and G. Dawson, “Resting State Cortical Connectivity Reflected in EEG Coherence in Individuals With Autism,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 270–273, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012.
  26. E. V Orekhova et al., “Excess of High Frequency Electroencephalogram Oscillations in Boys with Autism,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1022–1029, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.029.
  27. R. Coben, A. R. Clarke, W. Hudspeth, and R. J. Barry, “EEG power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1002–1009, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.013.
  28. F. Fahmi, M. Melinda, P. D. Purnamasari, E. Elizar, and A. Rafiki, “Recognition of EEG Features in Autism Disorder Using SWT and Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 18, p. 2291, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15182291.
  29. M. Melinda, F. H. Juwono, I. K. A. Enriko, M. Oktiana, S. Mulyani, and K. Saddami, “Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform and Support Vector Machine for Autism Spectrum Disorder Electroencephalography Signal Classification,” Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, no. 3(107), pp. 73–90, 2023, doi: 10.32620/reks.2023.3.07.
  30. A. Li, J. Feitelberg, A. P. Saini, R. Höchenberger, and M. Scheltienne, “MNE-ICALabel: Automatically annotating ICA components with ICLabel in Python,” J. Open Source Softw., vol. 7, no. 76, p. 4484, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.21105/joss.04484.
  31. A. Mary Judith, S. Baghavathi Priya, and R. K. Mahendran, “Artifact Removal from EEG signals using Regenerative Multi-Dimensional Singular Value Decomposition and Independent Component Analysis,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 74, p. 103452, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103452.
  32. F. Artoni and C. M. Michel, “How does Independent Component Analysis Preprocessing Affect EEG Microstates?,” Brain Topography 2025 38:2, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 26-, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01098-4.
  33. W. Liu, K. Jia, and Z. Wang, “Graph-based EEG approach for depression prediction: integrating time-frequency complexity and spatial topology,” Front. Neurosci., vol. Volume 18-2024, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1367212.
  34. L. Cao et al., “A Novel Deep Learning Method Based on an Overlapping Time Window Strategy for Brain–Computer Interface-Based Stroke Rehabilitation,” Brain Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111502.
  35. H. Ismail Fawaz et al., “InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for time series classification,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2020 34:6, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1936–1962, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10618-020-00710-y.
  36. E. Rahimian, S. Zabihi, S. F. Atashzar, A. Asif, and A. Mohammadi, “Xceptiontime: Independent time-window xceptiontime architecture for hand gesture classification,” ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings, vol. 2020-May, pp. 1304–1308, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9054586.
  37. F. Chollet, “Xception: Deep Learning With Depthwise Separable Convolutions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jul. 2017.
Read More

References


J. Zeidan et al., “Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update,” May 01, 2022, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/aur.2696.

H. A. Hatim, Z. A. A. Alyasseri, and N. Jamil, “A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning,” Artificial Intelligence Review 2025 58:10, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 313-, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x.

J. Li et al., “Identification of autism spectrum disorder based on electroencephalography: A systematic review,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 170, p. 108075, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108075.

S. Das et al., “Machine learning approaches for electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography analyses in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review,” Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 123, p. 110705, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110705.

A. Chaddad, Y. Wu, R. Kateb, and A. Bouridane, “Electroencephalography Signal Processing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Methods and Techniques,” Jul. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/s23146434.

W. Mumtaz, S. Rasheed, and A. Irfan, “Selecting methods for a modular EEG pre-processing pipeline: An objective comparison,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 90, p. 105830, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102741.

C. H. Chuang, K. Y. Chang, C. S. Huang, and T. P. Jung, “IC-U-Net: A U-Net-based Denoising Autoencoder Using Mixtures of Independent Components for Automatic EEG Artifact Removal,” Neuroimage, vol. 263, p. 119586, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119586.

B. Kalita, N. Deb, and D. Das, “AnEEG: leveraging deep learning for effective artifact removal in EEG data,” Scientific Reports 2024 14:1, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 24234-, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75091-z.

M. Melinda et al., “Heavy–Light Soft-Vote Fusion of EEG Heatmaps for Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection,” Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 409–429, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.35882/jeeemi.v8i1.1377.

Y. Xu, Z. Yu, Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Li, and Y. Wang, “Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis with EEG signals using time series maps of brain functional connectivity and a combined CNN–LSTM model,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 250, p. 108196, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108196.

S. Y. Ke et al., “Classification of autism spectrum disorder using electroencephalography in Chinese children: a cross-sectional retrospective study.,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 18, p. 1330556, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1330556.

L. Shi et al., “TFSNet: A Time–Frequency Synergy Network Based on EEG Signals for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification,” Brain Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070684.

S. Alhassan, A. Soudani, and M. Almusallam, “Energy-Efficient EEG-Based Scheme for Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection Using Wearable Sensors,” Sensors 2023, Vol. 23, vol. 23, no. 4, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23042228.

M. Melinda, F. Arnia, A. Yafi, N. Afny, C. Andryani, and K. A. Enriko, “Design and Implementation of Mobile Application for CNN-Based EEG Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder,” vol. 14, no. 1, 2024.

F. Abedinzadeh Torghabeh, Y. Modaresnia, and M. H. Moattar, “Hybrid deep transfer learning-based early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using scalogram representation of electroencephalography signals,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2023 62:2, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 495–503, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02959-z.

A. Rafiki et al., “Implementation of Vision Transformer for Early Detection of Autism Based on EEG Signal Heatmap Visualization,” Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2025.

D. Nhu et al., “Automated interictal epileptiform discharge detection from scalp EEG using scalable time-series classification approaches,” Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 2350001, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1142/S0129065723500016.

A. Brenner et al., “Concept-based AI interpretability in physiological time-series data: Example of abnormality detection in electroencephalography,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 257, no. 1, p. 108448, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108448.

N. Khaleghi et al., “EEG-based functional connectivity analysis of brain abnormalities: A systematic review study,” Inform. Med. Unlocked, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 101476, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2024.101476.

M. Elbattah, O. Ali Sadek Ibrahim, and G. Dequen, “Editorial: Improving autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using machine learning techniques,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics , vol. 18, p. 1529839, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1529839.

A. Shaikh, A. Koli, P. Awubaigol, S. Mali, R. Khanai, and P. Akkasaligar, “Artificial Intelligence for Autism Detection Using EEG Signals and Lightweight Neural Networks,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1668 LNNS, pp. 231–242, 2026, doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-07735-6_20.

I. Nafisah et al., “Deep learning-based feature selection for detection of autism spectrum disorder,” Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 8, p. 1594372, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1594372.

M. Z. Uddin, M. A. Shahriar, M. N. Mahamood, F. Alnajjar, M. I. Pramanik, and M. A. R. Ahad, “Deep learning with image-based autism spectrum disorder analysis: A systematic review,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 127, p. 107185, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107185.

M. J. Alhaddad et al., “Diagnosis Autism by Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis FLDA via EEG,” 2012.

M. Murias, S. J. Webb, J. Greenson, and G. Dawson, “Resting State Cortical Connectivity Reflected in EEG Coherence in Individuals With Autism,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 270–273, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012.

E. V Orekhova et al., “Excess of High Frequency Electroencephalogram Oscillations in Boys with Autism,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1022–1029, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.029.

R. Coben, A. R. Clarke, W. Hudspeth, and R. J. Barry, “EEG power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1002–1009, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.013.

F. Fahmi, M. Melinda, P. D. Purnamasari, E. Elizar, and A. Rafiki, “Recognition of EEG Features in Autism Disorder Using SWT and Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 18, p. 2291, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15182291.

M. Melinda, F. H. Juwono, I. K. A. Enriko, M. Oktiana, S. Mulyani, and K. Saddami, “Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform and Support Vector Machine for Autism Spectrum Disorder Electroencephalography Signal Classification,” Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, no. 3(107), pp. 73–90, 2023, doi: 10.32620/reks.2023.3.07.

A. Li, J. Feitelberg, A. P. Saini, R. Höchenberger, and M. Scheltienne, “MNE-ICALabel: Automatically annotating ICA components with ICLabel in Python,” J. Open Source Softw., vol. 7, no. 76, p. 4484, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.21105/joss.04484.

A. Mary Judith, S. Baghavathi Priya, and R. K. Mahendran, “Artifact Removal from EEG signals using Regenerative Multi-Dimensional Singular Value Decomposition and Independent Component Analysis,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 74, p. 103452, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103452.

F. Artoni and C. M. Michel, “How does Independent Component Analysis Preprocessing Affect EEG Microstates?,” Brain Topography 2025 38:2, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 26-, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01098-4.

W. Liu, K. Jia, and Z. Wang, “Graph-based EEG approach for depression prediction: integrating time-frequency complexity and spatial topology,” Front. Neurosci., vol. Volume 18-2024, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1367212.

L. Cao et al., “A Novel Deep Learning Method Based on an Overlapping Time Window Strategy for Brain–Computer Interface-Based Stroke Rehabilitation,” Brain Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111502.

H. Ismail Fawaz et al., “InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for time series classification,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2020 34:6, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1936–1962, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10618-020-00710-y.

E. Rahimian, S. Zabihi, S. F. Atashzar, A. Asif, and A. Mohammadi, “Xceptiontime: Independent time-window xceptiontime architecture for hand gesture classification,” ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings, vol. 2020-May, pp. 1304–1308, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9054586.

F. Chollet, “Xception: Deep Learning With Depthwise Separable Convolutions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Jul. 2017.

Author Biography

Rachmawati Rachmawati, Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

Department of Electrical Engineering

Download this PDF file
Statistic
Read Counter : 16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Prof. Robert Lis
Editorial Board
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Orcid  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Prof. Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License