Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11, No. 2, May 2026
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 11, No. 2, May 2026

Issue Published : May 1, 2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Parameter-Efficient Models for Malaria Detection and Classification Using Small-Scale Imbalanced Blood Smear Images

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i2.2558
Akhiyar Waladi
Universitas Jambi
Hasanatul Iftitah
Universitas Jambi
Nindy Raisa Hanum
Universitas Jambi
Yogi Perdana
Universitas Jambi
Fitra Wahyuni
Universitas Jambi
Rahmad Ashar
Universitas Jambi

Corresponding Author(s) : Hasanatul Iftitah

hasanatul.iftitah@unja.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 11, No. 2, May 2026
Article Published : May 1, 2026

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Malaria diagnostic automation faces critical challenges, including severe class imbalance with ratios of up to 54:1, limited datasets containing 200 to 500 images, and computational inefficiency resulting from the need to train separate models for each detection-classification combination. This study developed a multi-model framework with a shared classification architecture that trains classification models once on ground-truth crops and reuses them across all detectors. The framework systematically evaluated three YOLO Medium architectures for parasite detection and six CNN architectures for lifecycle and species classification across four complementary malaria datasets totaling 1,544 microscopy images. Detection achieved mAP@50 scores ranging from 70.84% to 96.27%, with high recall values of 71.05% to 93.12% minimizing missed parasite detections. Classification results demonstrated the importance of dataset-dependent model selection, with parameter-efficient EfficientNet models containing 5.3M to 9.2M parameters consistently outperforming ResNet variants with up to 44.5M parameters. EfficientNet-B1 achieved accuracies of 91.51% on the IML Lifecycle dataset and 98.28% on the MP-IDB Species dataset, while EfficientNet-B0 achieved 86.45% on the multi-patient MD-2019 dataset. ResNet50 achieved 96.13% accuracy on severely imbalanced MP-IDB Stages dataset. Focal Loss optimization with alpha = 1.0 and gamma = 1.5 enabled robust minority-class performance, achieving F1-scores between 0.44 and 1.00 on ultra-minority classes and demonstrating effective handling of class imbalance. The compact models, with sizes ranging from 46 MB to 89 MB, enable practical deployment on resource-constrained hardware.

Keywords

Malaria diagnosis Multi-model framework Parasite classification Transfer learning Class imbalance
Waladi, A., Iftitah, H., Hanum, N. R. ., Perdana, Y., Wahyuni, F., & Ashar, R. (2026). Parameter-Efficient Models for Malaria Detection and Classification Using Small-Scale Imbalanced Blood Smear Images. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 11(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i2.2558
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. W. H. Organization, World malaria report 2024: addressing inequity in the global malaria response. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2024.
  2. World Health Organization, “Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030, 2021 update,” 2021. Accessed: May 23, 2025.
  3. H. Sutanto, “Combating Malaria with Vaccines: Insights from the One Health Framework,” Sep. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/amh69030015
  4. S. Rajaraman, S. Jaeger, and S. K. Antani, “Performance evaluation of deep neural ensembles toward malaria parasite detection in thin-blood smear images,” PeerJ, vol. 7, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.6977
  5. Q. A. Arshad et al., “A dataset and benchmark for malaria life-cycle classification in thin blood smear images,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4473–4485, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06602-6
  6. A. Loddo, C. Fadda, and C. Di Ruberto, “An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis,” J. Imaging, vol. 8, no. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030066
  7. L. Zedda, A. Loddo, and C. Di Ruberto, “A Deep Learning Based Framework for Malaria Diagnosis on High Variation Data Set,” in Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2022, S. Sclaroff, C. Distante, M. Leo, G. M. Farinella, and F. Tombari, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06430-2_30
  8. L. Zedda, A. Loddo, and C. Di Ruberto, “YOLO-PAM: Parasite-Attention-Based Model for Efficient Malaria Detection,” J. Imaging, vol. 9, no. 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9120266
  9. D. Sukumarran et al., “An optimised YOLOv4 deep learning model for efficient malarial cell detection in thin blood smear images,” Parasit. Vectors, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 188, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06215-7
  10. E. Pachetti and S. Colantonio, “A systematic review of few-shot learning in medical imaging,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 156, p. 102949, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102949
  11. F. B. Tek, A. G. Dempster, and I. Kale, “Computer vision for microscopy diagnosis of malaria,” Malar. J., vol. 8, no. 1, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-153
  12. M. Salmi, D. Atif, D. Oliva, A. Abraham, and S. Ventura, “Handling imbalanced medical datasets: review of a decade of research,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 57, no. 10, p. 273, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10884-2
  13. F. Yang et al., “Deep Learning for Smartphone-Based Malaria Parasite Detection in Thick Blood Smears,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1427–1438, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2939121
  14. K. Alkandary, A. S. Yildiz, and H. Meng, “A Comparative Study of YOLO Series (v3–v10) with DeepSORT and StrongSORT: A Real-Time Tracking Performance Study,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14050876
  15. X. Li et al., “Generalized focal loss: learning qualified and distributed bounding boxes for dense object detection,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, in NIPS ’20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2020.
  16. R. Dutt, L. Ericsson, P. Sanchez, S. A. Tsaftaris, and T. Hospedales, “Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Image Analysis: The Missed Opportunity,” in Proceedings of The 7nd International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, N. Burgos, C. Petitjean, M. Vakalopoulou, S. Christodoulidis, P. Coupe, H. Delingette, C. Lartizien, and D. Mateus, Eds., in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 250. PMLR, Oct. 2024, pp. 406–425.
  17. M. Fischer, A. Bartler, and B. Yang, “Prompt tuning for parameter-efficient medical image segmentation,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 91, p. 103024, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.103024
  18. Y. Peng, “Efficient Deep Learning Methods for Medical Image Analysis,” Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7274/27147567.v1
  19. C. and K. M. and P. G. Loddo Andrea and Di Ruberto, “MP-IDB: The Malaria Parasite Image Database for Image Processing and Analysis,” in Processing and Analysis of Biomedical Information, J. and R. E. and R. D. and J. L. Lepore Natasha and Brieva, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13835-6_7
  20. S. S. Abbas and T. M. H. Dijkstra, “Malaria-Detection-2019,” 2019, Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/5bf2kmwvfn.1
  21. F. Garcea, A. Serra, F. Lamberti, and L. Morra, “Data augmentation for medical imaging: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 152, p. 106391, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106391
  22. G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely Connected Convolutional Networks,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 2261–2269. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243
  23. M. Tan and Q. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, Eds., in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 97. PMLR, Oct. 2019, pp. 6105–6114.
  24. J. Cheng et al., “ResGANet: Residual group attention network for medical image classification and segmentation,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 76, p. 102313, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102313
  25. J. Snell, K. Swersky, and R. Zemel, “Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.
  26. K. Hoyos and W. Hoyos, “Supporting Malaria Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Data Augmentation,” Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070690
  27. Y. Lei, R. L. J. Qiu, T. Wang, W. J. Curran, T. Liu, and X. Yang, “Chapter 7 - Generative adversarial networks for medical image synthesis,” in Biomedical Image Synthesis and Simulation, N. Burgos and D. Svoboda, Eds., Academic Press, 2022, pp. 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824349-7.00014-1
  28. A. Kazerouni et al., “Diffusion models in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 88, p. 102846, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102846
  29. X. Fang, C. F. Chong, K. L. Wong, M. Simões, and B. K. Ng, “Investigating the key principles in two-step heterogeneous transfer learning for early laryngeal cancer identification,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2146, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84836-9
  30. A. Ouahab and O. Ben Ahmed, “ProtoMed: Prototypical networks with auxiliary regularization for few-shot medical image classification,” Image Vis. Comput., vol. 154, p. 105337, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105337
  31. J. Zhang et al., “Advances in attention mechanisms for medical image segmentation,” Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 56, p. 100721, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100721
  32. T. A. Aris, A. S. A. Nasir, W. A. Mustafa, M. Y. Mashor, E. V. Haryanto, and Z. Mohamed, “Robust Image Processing Framework for Intelligent Multi-Stage Malaria Parasite Recognition of Thick and Thin Smear Images,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030511
  33. M. P. Singh et al., “A Healthcare System Employing Lightweight CNN for Disease Prediction with Artificial Intelligence,” Open Public Health J., vol. 17, no. 1, Jul. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445302023240520111802
Read More

References


W. H. Organization, World malaria report 2024: addressing inequity in the global malaria response. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2024.

World Health Organization, “Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030, 2021 update,” 2021. Accessed: May 23, 2025.

H. Sutanto, “Combating Malaria with Vaccines: Insights from the One Health Framework,” Sep. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/amh69030015

S. Rajaraman, S. Jaeger, and S. K. Antani, “Performance evaluation of deep neural ensembles toward malaria parasite detection in thin-blood smear images,” PeerJ, vol. 7, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.6977

Q. A. Arshad et al., “A dataset and benchmark for malaria life-cycle classification in thin blood smear images,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4473–4485, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06602-6

A. Loddo, C. Fadda, and C. Di Ruberto, “An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis,” J. Imaging, vol. 8, no. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030066

L. Zedda, A. Loddo, and C. Di Ruberto, “A Deep Learning Based Framework for Malaria Diagnosis on High Variation Data Set,” in Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2022, S. Sclaroff, C. Distante, M. Leo, G. M. Farinella, and F. Tombari, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06430-2_30

L. Zedda, A. Loddo, and C. Di Ruberto, “YOLO-PAM: Parasite-Attention-Based Model for Efficient Malaria Detection,” J. Imaging, vol. 9, no. 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9120266

D. Sukumarran et al., “An optimised YOLOv4 deep learning model for efficient malarial cell detection in thin blood smear images,” Parasit. Vectors, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 188, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06215-7

E. Pachetti and S. Colantonio, “A systematic review of few-shot learning in medical imaging,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 156, p. 102949, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102949

F. B. Tek, A. G. Dempster, and I. Kale, “Computer vision for microscopy diagnosis of malaria,” Malar. J., vol. 8, no. 1, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-153

M. Salmi, D. Atif, D. Oliva, A. Abraham, and S. Ventura, “Handling imbalanced medical datasets: review of a decade of research,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 57, no. 10, p. 273, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10884-2

F. Yang et al., “Deep Learning for Smartphone-Based Malaria Parasite Detection in Thick Blood Smears,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1427–1438, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2939121

K. Alkandary, A. S. Yildiz, and H. Meng, “A Comparative Study of YOLO Series (v3–v10) with DeepSORT and StrongSORT: A Real-Time Tracking Performance Study,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14050876

X. Li et al., “Generalized focal loss: learning qualified and distributed bounding boxes for dense object detection,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, in NIPS ’20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2020.

R. Dutt, L. Ericsson, P. Sanchez, S. A. Tsaftaris, and T. Hospedales, “Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Image Analysis: The Missed Opportunity,” in Proceedings of The 7nd International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, N. Burgos, C. Petitjean, M. Vakalopoulou, S. Christodoulidis, P. Coupe, H. Delingette, C. Lartizien, and D. Mateus, Eds., in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 250. PMLR, Oct. 2024, pp. 406–425.

M. Fischer, A. Bartler, and B. Yang, “Prompt tuning for parameter-efficient medical image segmentation,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 91, p. 103024, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.103024

Y. Peng, “Efficient Deep Learning Methods for Medical Image Analysis,” Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7274/27147567.v1

C. and K. M. and P. G. Loddo Andrea and Di Ruberto, “MP-IDB: The Malaria Parasite Image Database for Image Processing and Analysis,” in Processing and Analysis of Biomedical Information, J. and R. E. and R. D. and J. L. Lepore Natasha and Brieva, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13835-6_7

S. S. Abbas and T. M. H. Dijkstra, “Malaria-Detection-2019,” 2019, Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/5bf2kmwvfn.1

F. Garcea, A. Serra, F. Lamberti, and L. Morra, “Data augmentation for medical imaging: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 152, p. 106391, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106391

G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely Connected Convolutional Networks,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 2261–2269. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243

M. Tan and Q. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, Eds., in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 97. PMLR, Oct. 2019, pp. 6105–6114.

J. Cheng et al., “ResGANet: Residual group attention network for medical image classification and segmentation,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 76, p. 102313, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102313

J. Snell, K. Swersky, and R. Zemel, “Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc., 2017.

K. Hoyos and W. Hoyos, “Supporting Malaria Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Data Augmentation,” Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070690

Y. Lei, R. L. J. Qiu, T. Wang, W. J. Curran, T. Liu, and X. Yang, “Chapter 7 - Generative adversarial networks for medical image synthesis,” in Biomedical Image Synthesis and Simulation, N. Burgos and D. Svoboda, Eds., Academic Press, 2022, pp. 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824349-7.00014-1

A. Kazerouni et al., “Diffusion models in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 88, p. 102846, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102846

X. Fang, C. F. Chong, K. L. Wong, M. Simões, and B. K. Ng, “Investigating the key principles in two-step heterogeneous transfer learning for early laryngeal cancer identification,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2146, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84836-9

A. Ouahab and O. Ben Ahmed, “ProtoMed: Prototypical networks with auxiliary regularization for few-shot medical image classification,” Image Vis. Comput., vol. 154, p. 105337, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105337

J. Zhang et al., “Advances in attention mechanisms for medical image segmentation,” Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 56, p. 100721, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100721

T. A. Aris, A. S. A. Nasir, W. A. Mustafa, M. Y. Mashor, E. V. Haryanto, and Z. Mohamed, “Robust Image Processing Framework for Intelligent Multi-Stage Malaria Parasite Recognition of Thick and Thin Smear Images,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030511

M. P. Singh et al., “A Healthcare System Employing Lightweight CNN for Disease Prediction with Artificial Intelligence,” Open Public Health J., vol. 17, no. 1, Jul. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445302023240520111802

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 224 Download : 13

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Prof. Robert Lis
Editorial Board
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Orcid  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Prof. Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License