Issue

Vol. 11, No. 1, February 2026 (Article in Progress)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Website Quality Evaluation of OKE Garden Using WebQual, Marketing Mix, and Importance-Performance Analysis

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i1.2420
Nadya Kamilia Faiqoh
IPB University
Popong Nurhayati
IPB University
Heny Kuswanti Suwarsinah
IPB University

Corresponding Author(s) : Nadya Kamilia Faiqoh

kamiliafaiqoh@apps.ipb.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 11, No. 1, February 2026 (Article in Progress)

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies has significantly impacted various service sectors, including the garden landscape industry. In response to this development, OKE Garden has implemented a website-based e-commerce platform aimed at improving service accessibility and operational efficiency. This study seeks to evaluate the usability and service quality of this digital platform from the user’s perspective by adopting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as an analytical framework. Within this framework, Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) is assessed using WebQual 4.0 indicators, while Perceived Usefulness (PU) is measured through the four elements of the marketing mix, namely Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. To analyze the alignment between user expectations and actual service performance, the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was utilized. Data were obtained from 57 respondents in the Greater Jakarta area (Jabodetabek), primarily first-time users who had previously interacted with the OKE Garden website. Prior to analysis, the data underwent validity and reliability testing to ensure robustness. The findings show that users rated the importance of website attributes higher than their actual performance, indicating a gap that highlights areas requiring improvement. Several key indicators were identified, including ease of navigation, clarity of information, data security, and pricing strategy, which were categorized in Quadrant I (high importance, low performance), indicating areas that require immediate attention. Overall, the results suggest that while digital technology adoption has taken place, user acceptance remains suboptimal. Therefore, a more comprehensive enhancement of usability and service quality is necessary to meet user expectations and improve overall satisfaction.

Keywords

Digital Adoption Digital Service Quality E-commerce Platform Technology Acceptance Model User Acceptance
Faiqoh, N. K., Popong Nurhayati, & Heny Kuswanti Suwarsinah. (2026). Website Quality Evaluation of OKE Garden Using WebQual, Marketing Mix, and Importance-Performance Analysis. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i1.2420
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. B. P. P. I Gede, S. Made, and G. Nyoman, “Analysis Quality of Employment Information Systems Using Webqual 4.0 and Importance Performance Analysis Method,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2024, doi: 10.23887/janapati.v13i1.70713.
  2. T. Wulfert, R. Woroch, and G. Strobel, “Follow the Flow : An Exploratory Multi-case Study of Value Creation in E- Commerce Ecosystems Faculty of Computer Science , University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen , Germany Corresponding Author :,” Inf. Manag., 2024, doi: doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.104035.
  3. A. Alwendi, “Penerapan E-Commerce Dalam Meningkatkan,” Manaj. Bisnis, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.38043/jmb.v17i3.2486
  4. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII), “Internet Indonesia,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://survei.apjii.or.id/
  5. P. U. Musthofa and Y. Amrozi, “Model Situs E-Commerce Tanaman Hias,” SIMADA (Jurnal Sist. Inf. dan Manaj. Basis Data), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.30873/simada.v4i1.2615
  6. Kementerian Perdagangan, “Perdagangan Digital ( E-Commerce ) Indonesia Periode 2023,” Jakarta, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://satudata.kemendag.go.id/ringkasan/produk/perdagangan-digital-e-commerce-indonesia-periode-2023
  7. S. R. Natasia, Y. T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, “Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 512–520, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
  8. D. Nurdiana, M. R. Maulana, D. A. Aprijani, and F. Amastini, “Analysis of Field Work Practice Information System Service Quality Using The Webqual 4.0 Method And Importance Performance Analysis,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform. JANAPATI, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 571–583, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v13i3.79182
  9. H. A. Fachriyan, J. Jamhari, I. Irham, and L. R. Waluyati, “The Effect of E-Marketing Mix on Competitive Positional Advantage: A Study on E-Marketplaces in Indonesia,” Qual. - Access to Success, vol. 23, no. 190, pp. 144–155, 2022, doi: 10.47750/QAS/23.190.17.
  10. J. Y. Nugraha, N. Hasanah, and I. Hermadi, “Analysis of the Quality of Entities Digital Platform at the ASEAN Secretariat Using WebQual 4.0,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 92–100, 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240411 .
  11. R. P. Putra, R. G. Utomo, and M. F. Fathoni, “Website quality analysis using modified webqual method and importance performance analysis on SITU TAK website,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i1
  12. Y. Tarigan, A. Na’im, and A. Martha Devano, “Analysis of HNI Website Service Quality Using Webqual 4.0 and Importance-performance Analysis (IPA) Methods in Sei Beduk District, Batam City,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 2024, pp. 126–146, 2024, doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i25.16956.
  13. P. O. Tumilaar, D. P. E. Saerang, and W. J. F. . Tumbuan, “Analyzing The Marketing Mix Of PT. Gudang Garam Tbk By Using Importance And Performance Analysis,” J. EMBA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 440–449, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.8.1.2020.27781
  14. Fidia et al., “Analisa Implementasi Manajemen Rantai Pasok Berbasis Erp Pada Sistem Distribusi PT Semen Indonesia Tbk,” Transekonomika Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuang., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–164, 2022, doi: 10.55047/transekonomika.v2i3.135.
  15. C. Budihartanti, “Measurement e-commerce Services Quality : Applying Webqual 4 . 0 and Importance Performance Analysis,” J. Comput. Sci. an Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–79, 2020, doi: https://icsejournal.com/index.php/JCSE/article/view/26
  16. I. A. Bogoslov, E. A. Stoica, Mircea Radu Georgescu, A. E. Lungu, and D. Sitea, “Gamification in E-Commerce: Advantages, Challenges, and Future Trends,” Rev. Econ., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 17–33, 2023, doi: 10.56043/reveco-2023-0012.
  17. L. G. Ruiz-Herrera, A. Valencia-Arias, A. Gallegos, M. Benjumea-Arias, and E. Flores-Siapo, “Technology acceptance factors of e-commerce among young people: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16418.
  18. E. Herowati, “The Effect of Implementing the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) on Shopping Intention (Behavioral Intention) Using Paylater,” Indones. J. Interdiscip. Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.55927/marcopolo.v2i1.7891.
  19. L. Pan, Y. Ye, and X. Li, “Factors affecting Thai EFL students’ behavioral intentions toward mobile-assisted language learning,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, no. February, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1333771.
  20. R. M. Pelengkahu, W. J. F. . Tumbuan, and F. Roring, “Pengaruh Promosi, Phisical Evidence, Harga Pemasaran Digital Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada E-Commerce Shopee Di Kota Manado,” J. EMBA, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 786–797, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v11i1.46181.
  21. A. Rosário and R. Raimundo, “Consumer marketing strategy and e-commerce in the last decade: A literature review,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 3003–3024, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070164
  22. I. S. Utami, Winarno, and H. Setiadi, “Analysis the Effect of Website Quality on User Satisfaction with the WebQual 4.0 Method and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) (Case Study: SPMB Sebelas Maret University’s Website),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, pp. 0–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012003.
  23. T. W. Wirati, S. Umayah, F. I. Putra, Febriyanti, M. R. S. Anggara, and S. A.-F. Laksana, “Analysis of Business Strategy Development Using the Business Model canvas Approach,” J. Ekon. Syariah Indones. ISSN, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v12i4.2727.
  24. D. Saputra and B. Gürbüz, “Implementation of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) in Testing the Ease and Usability of E-wallet Applications,” arXiv, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 4–7, 2021, doi : arXiv:2103.09049.
  25. T. Moladia and T. Kristiana, “Penerapan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (Ipa) Untuk Menganalisis Kualitas Aplikasi Tokopedia Berdasarkan Kepuasan Pelanggan,” Komputa J. Ilm. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2023, doi: 10.34010/komputa.v12i1.8964.
  26. I. D. Kurniawan and V. P. Setyawan, “The Importance of Protecting E-Commerce Consumer Personal Data,” IJOLARES Indones. J. Law Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51–55, 2024, doi: 10.60153/ijolares.v2i2.66.
  27. B. Prasetyo, F. D. C. Ramadhani, and F. NurmanArifin, “Service Quality Analysis of Unej Digital Library Using M-S-QUAL and Importance Performance Analysis Methods,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v9i3.1918.
  28. A. Prabowo, S. Budi, Subiyanto, and N. Azis Salim, “Collaborative Filtering Modification Technology for Recommendation Systems in Smart Digital Agribusiness Marketplace,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 10, no. 3 SE-, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v10i3.2264.
  29. Berlilana, A. M. Wahid, D. Fortuna, A. N. A. Saputra, and G. Bagaskoro, “Exploring the Impact of Discount Strategies on Consumer Ratings: An Analytical Study of Amazon Product Reviews,” J. Appl. Data Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 158–172, 2024, doi: 10.47738/jads.v5i1.163.
  30. F. K. Ihtada, R. Alfianita, and O. Q. Aziz, “Aspect-based Multilabel Classification of E-commerce Reviews Using Fine-tuned IndoBERT,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v10i1.2088.
  31. N. Nurchayati, R. Ariyanti, and I. Marianingsih, “How Fintech Adoption, Digital Payment Systems, and Consumer Trust Shape Financial Performance of MSMEs,” Int. J. Business, Law, Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2458–2469, 2024, doi: 10.56442/ijble.v5i2.895.
  32. C. P. Nursalim, Tannia, and A. Robert, “Service Quality and Perceived Value Toward Customer Satisfaction in E-Commerce Delivery: The Role of Trust,” Int. J. Appl. Bus. Int. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 136–153, 2025, doi: 10.32535/ijabim.v10i1.3741.
  33. H. J. Juandri, H. Hasmawati, and B. Bunyamin, “Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis on GoPay App Reviews Using Multilayer Perceptron and Word Embeddings,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.2041.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
Statistic
Read Counter : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.