Issue

Vol. 11, No. 1, February 2026

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Website Quality Evaluation of OKE Garden using WebQual, The Marketing Mix, and Importance-Performance Analysis

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i1.2420
Nadya Kamilia Faiqoh
IPB University
Popong Nurhayati
IPB University
Heny Kuswanti Suwarsinah
IPB University

Corresponding Author(s) : Nadya Kamilia Faiqoh

kamiliafaiqoh@apps.ipb.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 11, No. 1, February 2026

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies has significantly impacted various service sectors, including the garden landscaping industry. In response to this development, OKE Garden has implemented a website-based e-commerce platform aimed at improving service accessibility and operational efficiency. This study seeks to evaluate the usability and service quality of this digital platform from the user’s perspective by adopting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the analytical framework. Within this framework, Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) is assessed using WebQual 4.0 indicators, while Perceived Usefulness (PU) is measured through the four elements of the marketing mix, namely Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. To analyze the alignment between user expectations and actual service performance, the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was utilized. Data were obtained from 57 respondents in the Greater Jakarta area (Jabodetabek), primarily first-time users who had previously interacted with the OKE Garden website. Prior to analysis, the data underwent validity and reliability testing to ensure robustness. The findings show that users rated the importance of website attributes higher than their actual performance, indicating a gap that highlights areas requiring improvement. Several key indicators were identified—including ease of navigation, clarity of information, data security, and pricing strategy—which were categorized in Quadrant I (high importance, low performance), indicating areas that require immediate attention. Overall, the results suggest that although digital technology adoption has taken place, user acceptance remains suboptimal. Therefore, a more comprehensive enhancement of usability and service quality is necessary to meet user expectations and improve overall satisfaction.

Keywords

Digital Adoption Digital Service Quality E-commerce Platform Technology Acceptance Model User Acceptance
Faiqoh, N. K., Popong Nurhayati, & Heny Kuswanti Suwarsinah. (2026). Website Quality Evaluation of OKE Garden using WebQual, The Marketing Mix, and Importance-Performance Analysis. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 11(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v11i1.2420
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. I. F. Rahayu, R. G. Prabowo, A. H. Permana, and ..., “Tinjauan Hukum Penyediaan dan Pengelolaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau berdasarkan Prinsip Good Environmental Governance di Kabupaten Karawang,” UNES Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 326–336, 2023.
  2. G. C. D. Podung, D. M. Rondonuwu, and V. A. Kumurur, “Community Perceptions and Preferences About Urban Farming in Manado City,” Sabua, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35793/sabua.v11i1.41231
  3. Zatia, F. Kumalasari, and A. R. Wonua, “Pengaruh Kapabilitas Dinamis Dan Kapabilitas Inovasi Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif,” Manaj. Kreat. J., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 176–188, 2023.
  4. B. P. P. I Gede, S. Made, and G. Nyoman, “Analysis Quality of Employment Information Systems Using Webqual 4.0 and Importance Performance Analysis Method,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2024. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v13i1.70713
  5. T. Wulfert, R. Woroch, and G. Strobel, “Follow the Flow : An Exploratory Multi-case Study of Value Creation in E- Commerce Ecosystems Faculty of Computer Science , University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen , Germany Corresponding Author :,” Inf. Manag., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.104035
  6. A. Alwendi, “Penerapan E-Commerce Dalam Meningkatkan,” Manaj. Bisnis, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 2020. https://doi.org/10.38043/jmb.v17i3.2486
  7. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII), “Internet Indonesia,” 2024.
  8. Kementerian Perdagangan, “Perdagangan Digital ( E-Commerce ) Indonesia Periode 2023,” Jakarta, 2024.
  9. S. R. Natasia, Y. T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, “Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 512–520, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
  10. D. Nurdiana, M. R. Maulana, D. A. Aprijani, and F. Amastini, “Analysis of Field Work Practice Information System Service Quality Using The Webqual 4.0 Method And Importance Performance Analysis,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform. JANAPATI, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 571–583, 2024. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v13i3.79182
  11. H. A. Fachriyan, J. Jamhari, I. Irham, and L. R. Waluyati, “The Effect of E-Marketing Mix on Competitive Positional Advantage: A Study on E-Marketplaces in Indonesia,” Qual. - Access to Success, vol. 23, no. 190, pp. 144–155, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.190.17
  12. J. Y. Nugraha, N. Hasanah, and I. Hermadi, “Analysis of the Quality of Entities Digital Platform at the ASEAN Secretariat Using WebQual 4.0,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 92–100, 2024. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240411
  13. R. P. Putra, R. G. Utomo, and M. F. Fathoni, “Website quality analysis using modified webqual method and importance performance analysis on SITU TAK website,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i1.1866
  14. Y. Tarigan, A. Na’im, and A. Martha Devano, “Analysis of HNI Website Service Quality Using Webqual 4.0 and Importance-performance Analysis (IPA) Methods in Sei Beduk District, Batam City,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 2024, pp. 126–146, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i25.16956
  15. Fidia et al., “Analisa Implementasi Manajemen Rantai Pasok Berbasis Erp Pada Sistem Distribusi PT Semen Indonesia Tbk,” Transekonomika Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuang., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–164, 2022. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v2i3.135
  16. P. O. Tumilaar, D. P. E. Saerang, and W. J. F. . Tumbuan, “Analyzing The Marketing Mix Of PT. Gudang Garam Tbk By Using Importance And Performance Analysis,” J. EMBA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 440–449, 2020. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.8.1.2020.27781
  17. C. Budihartanti, “Measurement e-commerce Services Quality : Applying Webqual 4 . 0 and Importance Performance Analysis,” J. Comput. Sci. an Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–79, 2020.
  18. I. A. Bogoslov, E. A. Stoica, Mircea Radu Georgescu, A. E. Lungu, and D. Sitea, “Gamification in E-Commerce: Advantages, Challenges, and Future Trends,” Rev. Econ., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 17–33, 2023. https://doi.org/10.56043/reveco-2023-0012
  19. L. G. Ruiz-Herrera, A. Valencia-Arias, A. Gallegos, M. Benjumea-Arias, and E. Flores-Siapo, “Technology acceptance factors of e-commerce among young people: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16418
  20. E. Herowati, “The Effect of Implementing the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) on Shopping Intention (Behavioral Intention) Using Paylater,” Indones. J. Interdiscip. Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i1.7891
  21. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  22. I. S. Utami, Winarno, and H. Setiadi, “Analysis the Effect of Website Quality on User Satisfaction with the WebQual 4.0 Method and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) (Case Study: SPMB Sebelas Maret University’s Website),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, pp. 0–8, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012003
  23. R. M. Pelengkahu, W. J. F. . Tumbuan, and F. Roring, “Pengaruh Promosi, Phisical Evidence, Harga Pemasaran Digital Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada E-Commerce Shopee Di Kota Manado,” J. EMBA, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 786–797, 2023. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v11i1.46181
  24. A. Rosário and R. Raimundo, “Consumer marketing strategy and e-commerce in the last decade: A literature review,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 3003–3024, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070164
  25. T. W. Wirati, S. Umayah, F. I. Putra, Febriyanti, M. R. S. Anggara, and S. A.-F. Laksana, “Analysis of Business Strategy Development Using the Business Model canvas Approach,” J. Ekon. Syariah Indones. ISSN, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v12i4.2727
  26. D. Saputra and B. Gürbüz, “Implementation of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) in Testing the Ease and Usability of E-wallet Applications,” arXiv, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 4–7, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.09049
  27. J. A. Martilla and J. C. James, “Importance-Per Analysis,” J. Mark., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–79, 1977.
  28. T. Moladia and T. Kristiana, “Penerapan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (Ipa) Untuk Menganalisis Kualitas Aplikasi Tokopedia Berdasarkan Kepuasan Pelanggan,” Komputa J. Ilm. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.34010/komputa.v12i1.8964
  29. I. D. Kurniawan and V. P. Setyawan, “The Importance of Protecting E-Commerce Consumer Personal Data,” IJOLARES Indones. J. Law Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51–55, 2024. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v2i2.66
  30. B. Prasetyo, F. D. C. Ramadhani, and F. NurmanArifin, “Service Quality Analysis of Unej Digital Library Using M-S-QUAL and Importance Performance Analysis Methods,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 3, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i3.1918
  31. A. Prabowo, S. Budi, Subiyanto, and N. Azis Salim, “Collaborative Filtering Modification Technology for Recommendation Systems in Smart Digital Agribusiness Marketplace,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 10, no. 3 SE-, Jun. 2025. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v10i3.2264
  32. Z. Morić, V. Dakic, D. Djekic, and D. Regvart, “Protection of Personal Data in the Context of E-Commerce,” J. Cybersecurity Priv., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 731–761, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp4030034
  33. P. Pant et al., “Authentication and Authorization in Modern Web Apps for Data Security Using Nodejs and Role of Dark Web,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 215, pp. 781–790, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.080
  34. P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran, Edisi ke 12. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, 2019.
  35. P. P. Rahmanita, U. Suhud, and N. Krissanya, “Analysis of Satisfaction and Loyalty Among Users of the Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit: What is the Role of Service Quality, Facilities, and Perceived Price,” Int. J. Educ. Soc. Stud. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 979–994, 2025. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v5i2.820
  36. N. Nurchayati, R. Ariyanti, and I. Marianingsih, “How Fintech Adoption, Digital Payment Systems, and Consumer Trust Shape Financial Performance of MSMEs,” Int. J. Business, Law, Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2458–2469, 2024. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i2.895
  37. H. J. Juandri, H. Hasmawati, and B. Bunyamin, “Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis on GoPay App Reviews Using Multilayer Perceptron and Word Embeddings,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Network, Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.2041
  38. IQAir, “2024 World Air Quality Report,” 2024.
  39. K. Hasan, “Kualitas udara Indonesia: Memburuk pada tahun 2023 tanpa intervensi efektif dan terpicu El Niño. Bagaimana pada tahun 2024?,” 2024.
  40. W. Sukamdani, Urban Farming : Kedaulatan Pangan dan Perbaikan Kualitas Lingkungan, 1st ed. Depok: Murai Kencana, 2021.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 217 Download : 16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.