Issue

Vol. 10, No. 2, May 2025

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Clustering of High School Quality Using Fuzzy C-Means in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v10i2.2187
Lilin Rofiqatul Ilmi
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Haryanto
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Maria Sumunaringtyas
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Corresponding Author(s) : Lilin Rofiqatul Ilmi

lilinrofiqotul.2022@student.uny.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 10, No. 2, May 2025

Abstract

This research aims to reveal the results of clustering high school quality using fuzzy c-means in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province. This research is quantitative and descriptive. Data collection was conducted through documentation. The research data are secondary data from the 2023 high school education report card. The sample consisted of 51 schools, which were determined using the proportional stratified random sampling. Data analysis was performed using the quantitative descriptive method and fuzzy c-means. The results of the study are clustering on the main indicator data producing three clusters: cluster 1 consists of 11 private schools accredited A and B, cluster 2 consists of 22 public and private schools accredited A, and cluster 3 consists of 18 schools accredited A, B, and C. Cluster 2 excels with the overall best performance, cluster 1 has moderate performance with several areas needing improvement, such as instructional leadership, the use of information technology for budget management, and inclusiveness, and cluster 3 shows the lowest performance, requiring significant attention and improvement in almost all aspects, especially literacy, numeracy, instructional leadership, and the use of information technology for budget management. Cluster 3, which had the lowest performance, showed an urgent need for improvement in almost all aspects.

Keywords

Clustering Education Report Card Fuzzy C-Means School Quality
Ilmi, L. R., Haryanto, & Sumunaringtyas, M. (2025). Clustering of High School Quality Using Fuzzy C-Means in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v10i2.2187
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Z. Y. S. AL Dulaimi, “Education, Educational Services and their Quality,” Journal of Marketing Management (JMM), vol. 4, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.15640/jmm.v3n2a6.
  2. J. M. G.-V. García, M. García-Carmona, J. M. Trujillo Torres, and P. Moya-Fernández, “Teacher training for educational change: The view of international experts,” Contemp Educ Technol, vol. 14, no. 1, p. ep330, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/11367.
  3. S. Alifah, “Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan di indonesia untuk mengejar ketertinggalan dari negara lain,” Jurnal Penelitian, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 114, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.36841/cermin_unars.v5i1.968.
  4. L. Guo, J. Huang, and Y. Zhang, “Education development in china: education return, quality, and equity,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 13, p. 1, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11133750.
  5. M. Ulumi, Manajemen Mutu Sekolah Unggulan. Cirebon: PT Arr Rad Pratama, 2023.
  6. I. R. Ridwan, “Keterkaitan pendidikan dengan peningkatan pertumbuhan ekonomi dan sumber daya manusia,” Jurnal Geografi Gea, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.17509/gea.v9i1.1677.
  7. D. Mardapi, “Evaluasi penerapan ujian akhir sekolah dasar berbasis standar nasional,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 228–243, 2009.
  8. A. Arman, B. Purwandaya, and A. Saefuddin, “The impact of quality of education and higher education on economic growth,” Journal of Economic Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64–70, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.15294/jeec.v9i1.36774.
  9. M. Iqbal, Z. Sumarni, N. I. Yani Harahap, and A. Hadi, “The Role of Human Resources in Improving School Quality,” GIC Proceeding, vol. 1, pp. 58–65, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.30983/gic.v1i1.144.
  10. A. Da Silva, U. A. Izzati, and K. Karwanto, “Optimization of Educator Quality through Job Analysis and Personnel Planning,” EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 105–114, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.862.
  11. R. K. Putri, “PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES LITERASI SAINS SISWA PADA TOPIK KEANEKARAGAMAN MAKHLUK HIDUP,” Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.33369/diklabio.4.1.71-78.
  12. D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 2012.
  13. N. A. S. Harwanti and A. T. Rumiati, “Pengelompokkan mutu sekolah dasar di indonesia berdasarkan standar nasional pendidikan dengan metode fuzzy c-means,” Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS, vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.12962/j23373520.v9i2.53312.
  14. T. Muttaqin, “Determinants of Unequal Access to and Quality of Education in Indonesia,” Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.36574/jpp.v2i1.27.
  15. D. A. Suryawan. S and T. Sugiyarto, “Inequality Of Education And Determines of It In Indonesia,” Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2022i1.1105.
  16. F. A. Suhendar, R. V. Sari, T. Pangesti, Z. M. G. Putra, and A. P. A. Santoso, “The Impact of Poverty in Indonesia on Education,” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), vol. 8, no. 2, p. 1119, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.58258/jisip.v8i2.6682.
  17. B. K. Fomba, D. N. D. F. Talla, and P. Ningaye, “Institutional quality and education quality in developing countries: effects and transmission channels,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 14, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00869-9.
  18. Fikastiana Cahya, Theresia Wati, and Erly Krisnanik, “Perancangan sistem informasi pengolahan data akademik pada pendidikan anak usia dini berbasis website,” Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–58, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.52158/jacost.v2i1.137.
  19. A. Saxena et al., “A review of clustering techniques and developments,” Neurocomputing, vol. 267, pp. 664–681, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053.
  20. B. Everitt, “Cluster analysis,” Qual Quant, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75–100, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.1007/BF00154794.
  21. M. A. Muslim et al., Data Mining Algoritma C4.5, 1st ed. 2019.
  22. Suyanto, Data Mining Untuk Klasifikasi Dan Klasterisasi Data, 1st ed. Bandung: Informatika Bandung, 2019.
  23. F. Anggoro et al., “Revisiting cluster vulnerabilities towards information and communication technologies in the eastern island of indonesia using fuzzy c means,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 3428, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14063428.
  24. A. Murugan, D. Gobinath, S. G. Kumar, B. Muruganantham, and S. Velusamy, “A time efficient and accurate retrieval of range aggregate queries using fuzzy clustering means (fcm) approach,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 10, no. 1, p. 415, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v10i1.pp415-420.
  25. R. R. Az-Zahra, R. Umar, and A. Fadlil, “Clustering Majors for New Students at Vocational High School Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta Using Fuzzy C-Means,” Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, pp. 271–278, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v3i3.642.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
Statistic
Read Counter : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.