Issue

Vol. 9, No. 4, November 2024 (Article in Progress)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Application of the PROMETHEE Method in Determining Scholarship Recipients at University

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.2014
Wahyu Prima
Universitas Adzkia
Firmansyah Putra
Universitas Dharmas Indonesia
Sopi Sapriadi
Universitas Adzkia
Rahmatul Hayati
Universitas Adzkia

Corresponding Author(s) : Wahyu Prima

wahyuprima341@gmail.com

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 9, No. 4, November 2024 (Article in Progress)

Abstract





This study aims to use the PROMETHEE method as a decision support system in determining the recipients of the Academic Achievement Improvement Scholarship at Universitas Dharmas Indonesia (UNDHARI). The methodological steps include problem identification, analysis, goal setting, and application of the PROMETHEE method. In this study, criteria and alternatives have been identified to evaluate achievement improvement scholarship recipients. The criteria weights are set, and the criteria preference types are determined. After obtaining baseline data from questionnaire assessments, pairwise preference values and multicriteria preference index values are calculated. Then, ranking is performed using the Leaving Flow, Entering Flow, and Net Flow methods, resulting in the priority order of Achievement Improvement scholarship recipients. The ranking results show that Irza Silvia (IS) has the highest Net Flow value (0.30), while Aldian Virgo Vani (AV) has the lowest Net Flow value (-0.35). Thus, the priority order from highest to lowest is IS (Irza Silvia), AV (Abdullah Gimnastiar), RD (Rini Damayanti), YM (Yesnia Marni), and AV (Aldian Virgo Vani). In the context of Net Flow scores, these results indicate that Irza Silvia (IS) has the greatest chance of receiving the achievement improvement scholarship. This study provides important insights for UNDHARI in the scholarship recipient determination process using the PROMETHEE method as a decision-making tool.





Keywords

Decision Support System Promethee Scholarship
Prima, W., Putra, F., Sapriadi, S., & Hayati, R. (2024). Application of the PROMETHEE Method in Determining Scholarship Recipients at University. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.2014
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. T. Radillah, ‘Menyeleksi Beasiswa Berprestasi Pada Sman 2 Mandau’, Jurnal Informatika, Manajemen dan Komputer, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2022.
  2. N. A. Khaliq, A. Josi, and L. Fujiyanti, ‘Sistem Informasi Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode SAW’, JSITIK: Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi Komputer, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94–108, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.53624/jsitik.v1i2.162.
  3. P. Aji Sasmito, Ilhamsyah, and R. Puspita Sari, ‘Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Dengan Menerapkan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)’, 2019. Accessed: Apr. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jcskommipa/article/view/30832
  4. M. Hatta, ‘Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Sistem DSS Seleksi Penerimaan Beasiswa Perguruan Tinggi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Intech: Information Technology Jurnal of UMUS, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 31–40, 2020.
  5. M. Fadlan, Muhammad, and H. Muhammad, ‘Terapan Kombinasi Metode Topsis dan Analytical Hierarchy Process Pada Perekomendasian Penerima Beasiswa Peningkatan Prestasi Akademik (Studi Kasus pada STMIK PPKIA Tarakanita Rahmawati)’, Simetris : Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 663, 2017, doi: 10.24176/simet.v8i2.1565.
  6. R. Akbar, A. A. Arifnur, J. Rahmadoni, and S. J. Putri, ‘Pemanfaatan Metode TOPSIS dalam Merancang Aplikasi Pendukung Keputusan untuk Memberikan Rekomendasi Hasil Medical Check Up pada Rumah Sakit’, JEPIN (Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 2023.
  7. P. Sakinah, N. Hayati, and A. E. Syaputra, ‘Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting’, Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 130–138, 2023, doi: 10.37034/jsisfotek.v5i1.222.
  8. S. Sandiwarno, ‘Penerapan Metode Service Quality (SERVQUAL) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) untuk Menentukan Pengambilan Keputusan terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan (Studi Kasus: Restoran Ayam Geprek)’, Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 88–99, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.21456/vol14iss1pp88-99.
  9. M. G. Wonoseto and M. Y. Alfiandy, ‘Implementasi Metode Fuzzy AHP untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Peminjaman pada Koperasi Kredit Sejahtera’, Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 104–111, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.21456/vol13iss2pp104-111.
  10. A. Damuri, T. Lisnawati, W. T. Fariati, and R. J. Rumandan, ‘Impelementasi Metode MOORA Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Teladan’, Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 492–500, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i3.3389.
  11. W. Prima, F. Putra, and Y. Yusran, ‘Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi di SDN 01 Abai Siat’, Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 257–265, 2022, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v11i2.1313.
  12. A. A. Soebroto, M. T. Furqon, E. A. S. Marhendraputro, and W. Ziaulhaq, ‘Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyakit Stroke menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Tsukamoto dengan Basis Pengetahuan Framingham Risk Score’, JEPIN (Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 214–226, 2022.
  13. R. W. Dari, S. Sapriadi, N. A. Rahmi, P. A. W. Purnama, and Imawati, ‘Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mobil Bekas’, Jurnal KomtekInfo, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73–79, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v10i2.378.
  14. R. D. Gunawan, F. Ariany, and Novriyadi, ‘Implementasi Metode SAW Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Plano Kertas’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.23.
  15. A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasaribu and Nuroji, ‘Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Pelanggan Terbaik Menggunakan Profile Matching’, Journal of Data Science and Information System (DIMIS), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2023.
  16. J. Kuswanto, M. N. Al Kodri, T. Devana, L. Pebriantika, and S. Ningsih, ‘Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting For Scholarship Admission Selection’, TIERS Information Technology Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.38043/tiers.v4i1.4022.
  17. T. Imandasari, A. Wanto, and A. P. Windarto, ‘Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Mahasiswa PKL Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE’, JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 234–239, 2018.
  18. W. A. Purnomo and R. Efendi, ‘Metode AHP untuk Menentukan Metode Pengajaran yang Tepat Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika’, International Journal of Technology Vocational Education and Training (IJTVET), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 2021.
  19. K. H. Manurung, A. E. Syaputra, and Y. S. Eirlangga, ‘Design the Best Student Selection Decision Support System With Simple Addictive Weighting (SAW) Method’, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of DYNAMICS in ENGINEERING and SCIENCES (IJDES) LLDIKTI WILAYAH X, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.22216/jod.v7i1.1089.
  20. H. Santoso, R. Azhar, I. P. Hariyadi, Husain, and Y. Suganda, ‘Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Penentuan Dosen Pengampu Mata Kuliah Dengan Metode PROMETHEE dan Borda’, Jurnal TEKNIMEDIA: Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2023.
  21. A. Soldati, A. Chiozzi, Ž. Nikolić, C. Vaccaro, and E. Benvenuti, ‘A PROMETHEE Multiple‐Criteria Approach to Combined Seismic and Flood Risk Assessment at the Regional Scale’, Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 3, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12031527.
  22. J. Wang, S. Li, and X. Zhou, ‘A Novel GDMD-PROMETHEE Algorithm Based on the Maximizing Deviation Method and Social Media Data Mining for Large Group Decision Making’, Symmetry (Basel), vol. 15, no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/sym15020387.
  23. W. Sałabun, J. Watróbski, and A. Shekhovtsov, ‘Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods’, Symmetry (Basel), vol. 12, no. 9, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SYM12091549.
  24. L. Oubahman and S. Duleba, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Homogenous Groups’ Preferences by Using AIP and AIJ Group AHP-PROMETHEE Model’, Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14105980.
  25. W. Prima and B. Putra, ‘Analisis Tingkat Kompetensi Dosen Stmik Dharmasraya Dengan Menggunakan Metode Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluation (Promethee)’, JOISIE (Journal Of Information Systems And Informatics Engineering), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–68, 2017, doi: 10.35145/joisie.v1i1.385.
  26. S. Aulia, Hardiyan, and M. Rosmiati, ‘Implementasi Metode Promethee dalam Menentukan Kenaikan Jabatan pada Nuansa Agung Garment’, MULTINETICS: Jurnal Multimedia Networking Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 160–167, 2023.
  27. M. A. Setiawan and S. Hartini, ‘Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Daging Untuk Proses Produksi Catering Dengan Metode AHP Dan PROMETHEE’, Jurnal Optimasi Teknik Industri (JOTI), vol. 4, no. 2, p. 59, 2022, doi: 10.30998/joti.v4i2.13633.
  28. F. Huzaeni, M. A. Faizal, and A. P. Widyassari, ‘Implementation of the Promethee Method for Decision Support in Laptop Selection’, Jurnal Ilmiah Intech : Information Technology Journal of UMUS, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 21–31, 2021.
  29. D. F. Sihite, ‘Penerapan Metode Promethee Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Sekolah Pada SMK Swasta Nurul Amaliyah Tanjung Morawa’, KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 603–612, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5766.
  30. T. Juninda, E. Andri, U. Khairunnisa, N. Kurniawati, and Mustakim, ‘Penerapan Metode Promethee Untuk Pendukung’, Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa dan Manajemen Sistem Informasi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 224–229, 2019.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
Statistic
Read Counter : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.