Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 9, No. 4, November 2024
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 9, No. 4, November 2024

Issue Published : Nov 1, 2024
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Performance Comparison between Double Exponential Smoothing and Double Moving Average Methods in Seasonal Beef Demand

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.1934
Bain Khusnul Khotimah
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Setiani
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Ana Yuniasti Retno Wulandari
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Devie Rosa Anamisa
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Corresponding Author(s) : Bain Khusnul Khotimah

bain@trunojoyo.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 9, No. 4, November 2024
Article Published : Nov 1, 2024

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Beef demand relies on seasonal patterns because it depends on feed supplies, especially in the rural areas, that still rely on natural feeds. Beef supply is regulated by the government as it is one of the highly demanded commodities. It is a livestock product containing nutritional value to meet the protein needs of the community. The supply is influenced by several factors such as beef production, beef consumption, and the people's income level. In order to anticipate the increasing demand for beef, it is necessary to conduct a forecast to estimate the demand for meat in the future. In forecasting, various methods were examined to choose the method with the lowest error rate. This research compared the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) resulted from Double Exponential Smoothing (DES) and Double Moving Average (DMA) methods. Based on the test results and analysis on beef supplies in Madura, it can be concluded that the method with the lowest MAPE value is Double Exponential Smoothing, i.e. 9.50% with an alpha parameter of 0.5. Meanwhile, the test using the Double Moving Average method to determine the best MAPE value, resulted the best time order of 2 with a MAPE value of 29.8408%. After finding the parameter with the lowest MAPE value, that parameter was used for the data testing. In the measurement, the data used for the testing were the data of 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year period. Each method has a level of error value that increases the same; the number of data entered can affect the MAPE value. Therefore, the more data entered, the lower the error value.

Keywords

Double Exponential Smoothing Double Moving Average Madura Cattle Forecasting MAPE Seasional Data
Khusnul Khotimah, B., Setiani, Wulandari, A. Y. R., & Anamisa, D. R. (2024). Performance Comparison between Double Exponential Smoothing and Double Moving Average Methods in Seasonal Beef Demand. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i4.1934
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Shahbandeh, “Cattle population worldwide 2012-2023,” Agriculture, Sep 19, 2023.
  2. K. Kozicka, J. Žukovskis, and W. Gront, E. Explaining Global Trends in Cattle Population Changes between 1961 and 2020 Directly Affecting Methane Emissions, Sustainability, Vol. 15, 10533, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310533
  3. M. Hwan Na, W. Cho, S. Kang, and Inseop Na, “Comparative Analysis of Statistical Regression Models for Prediction of Live Weight of Korean Cattle during Growth,” Agriculture, Vol.13, No.10, 1895, 27 September 2023. Comparative Analysis of Statistical Regression Models for Prediction of Live Weight of Korean Cattle during Growth
  4. B. K. Khotimah, F. Agustina, O. R. Puspitarini, Husni, D. R. Anamisa, N. Prayugo, and A. M. S. Putri, “Random Search Hyperparameter Optimization for BPNN to Forecasting Cattle Population,” E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 499, 01017, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449901017
  5. F. Firdaus, B. A. Atmoko, E. Baliarti, T. S. M. Widi, D. Maharani, and Panjono, “The meta-analysis of beef cattle body weight prediction using body measurement approach with breed, sex, and age categories,” J Adv Vet Anim Res., Vol. 10, No. 4, Pp. 630–638, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2023.j718
  6. T. C. Lwin, T. T. Zin and P. Tin, "Predicting Calving Time of Dairy Cows by Exponential Smoothing Models," 2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Kobe, Japan, Pp. 322-323, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE50665.2020.9291903
  7. V. Tenrisanna, and S. N. Kasim, “Trends and forecasting of meat production and consumption inIndonesia: Livestock development strategies,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 492, 012156, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012156
  8. D. Effrosynidis, E. Spiliotis, G. Sylaios, and A. Arampatzis, “Time series and regression methods for univariate environmental forecasting: An empirical evaluation,” in Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 875, 162580, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162580
  9. A. A. Dewi, and D. Idayani, “The Comparison of Simple Moving Average and Double Exponential Smoothing Methods in Predicting New Debtors,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi), Vol. 9, No. 3, Pp.369-376, June 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v9i3.2254
  10. M. A. C. Lascorz, P. J. Herrera. A. Troncoso, and G. A. Cortés, “A new hybrid method for predicting univariate and multivariate time series based on pattern forecasting,” Information Sciences, Vol. 586, Pp. 611-627, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162580
  11. I. Svetunkova. H. Chenb, and J. E. Boylan, “A new taxonomy for vector exponential smoothing and its application to seasonal time series,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 304, No. 3 Pp. 964-980, 1 February 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.040
  12. N. A. Atussaliha and P. H. Darwis, "Metode Double Exponential Smoothing pada Sistem Peramalan," ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, Vol. 3, Pp.183-190, Desember 2020. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v12i3.607.183-190
  13. G. Moiseev, “Forecasting oil tanker shipping market in crisis periods: Exponential smoothing model application,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.37, No. 3, Pp. 239-244, September 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.06.002
  14. J. F. R. Sanchez and L. M. Menezes, “Structural combination of seasonal exponential smoothing forecasts applied to load forecasting,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 275, No.3, Pp. 916–924, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.013
  15. D. Febrian, S. I. A. Idrus, and D. A. J. Nainggolan, “The Comparison of Double Moving Average and Double Exponential Smoothing Methods in Forecasting the Number of Foreign Tourists Coming to North Sumatera,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser, Vol,1462, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012046
  16. D. Guleryuz, “Forecasting outbreak of COVID-19 in Turkey; Comparison of Box–Jenkins, Brown’s exponential smoothing and long short-term memory models,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol.149, Pp. 927-935, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.032
  17. K. Talordphop, S. Sukparungsee, and Y. Areepong, “On designing new mixed modified exponentially weighted moving average - exponentially weighted moving average control chart,” Results in Engineering,18,101152, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.
  18. Q. Shao, A. Aldhafeeri, S. Qiu, and S. Khuder, “A multiplicative Holt–Winters model and autoregressive moving-average for hyponatremia mortality rates,” Healthcare Analytics, Vol. 4,100262, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2023.
  19. R. Taboran, S. Sukparungsee, and Y. Areepong, “Mixed moving average-exponentially weighted moving average control charts for monitoring of parameter change,” in: Proceeding of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Pp.13–15. 2019.
  20. M. Melikoglu, and Z. K. Menekse, “Forecasting Turkey's cattle and sheep manure based biomethane potentials till 2026,” Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol.132, 105440, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105440
  21. M. Ordu, and Y. Zengin, “A comparative forecasting approach to forecast animal production: A case of Turkey,” Livestock Studies, Vol. 60, No.1, Pp. 25-32, 2020. https://doi.org/10.46897/lahaed.719095
  22. S. Gokulakrishnan, G. Senthil Kumar, A. Serma Saravana Pandian, J. Ramesh, P. Thilakar, L. Radhakrishnan, and A. R. Nanthini, “Time Series Modelling and Forecasting of Prices of Cattle Feed In Tamil Nadu,” IJVASR, Vol. 53, No.2, March - April 2024.
  23. G. A. Ryu, A. Nasridinov, H. Rah, and K. Yoo, “Forecasts of the Amount Purchase Pork Meat by Using Structured and Unstructured Big Data,” Agriculture, Vol.10, No.1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10010021
  24. P. Guerra, Uri, L. Mamani, Natalio, P. Durand, Manuel, Pierr, Manrique, Condori, E. G. Herreros, and Manuel, “Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) time-series model for milk production forecasting in pasture-based dairy cows in the Andean highlands,” PLoS ONE, Vol.18, 2023. https://doi./10.1371/journal.pone.0288849
  25. E. Kasatkina, D. Vavilova, and R. Faizullin, “Development of econometric models to forecast indicators of the livestock industry,” E3S Web of Conferences, Vol.548, 03002, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454803002
Read More

References


M. Shahbandeh, “Cattle population worldwide 2012-2023,” Agriculture, Sep 19, 2023.

K. Kozicka, J. Žukovskis, and W. Gront, E. Explaining Global Trends in Cattle Population Changes between 1961 and 2020 Directly Affecting Methane Emissions, Sustainability, Vol. 15, 10533, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310533

M. Hwan Na, W. Cho, S. Kang, and Inseop Na, “Comparative Analysis of Statistical Regression Models for Prediction of Live Weight of Korean Cattle during Growth,” Agriculture, Vol.13, No.10, 1895, 27 September 2023. Comparative Analysis of Statistical Regression Models for Prediction of Live Weight of Korean Cattle during Growth

B. K. Khotimah, F. Agustina, O. R. Puspitarini, Husni, D. R. Anamisa, N. Prayugo, and A. M. S. Putri, “Random Search Hyperparameter Optimization for BPNN to Forecasting Cattle Population,” E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 499, 01017, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449901017

F. Firdaus, B. A. Atmoko, E. Baliarti, T. S. M. Widi, D. Maharani, and Panjono, “The meta-analysis of beef cattle body weight prediction using body measurement approach with breed, sex, and age categories,” J Adv Vet Anim Res., Vol. 10, No. 4, Pp. 630–638, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2023.j718

T. C. Lwin, T. T. Zin and P. Tin, "Predicting Calving Time of Dairy Cows by Exponential Smoothing Models," 2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Kobe, Japan, Pp. 322-323, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE50665.2020.9291903

V. Tenrisanna, and S. N. Kasim, “Trends and forecasting of meat production and consumption inIndonesia: Livestock development strategies,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 492, 012156, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012156

D. Effrosynidis, E. Spiliotis, G. Sylaios, and A. Arampatzis, “Time series and regression methods for univariate environmental forecasting: An empirical evaluation,” in Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 875, 162580, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162580

A. A. Dewi, and D. Idayani, “The Comparison of Simple Moving Average and Double Exponential Smoothing Methods in Predicting New Debtors,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi), Vol. 9, No. 3, Pp.369-376, June 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v9i3.2254

M. A. C. Lascorz, P. J. Herrera. A. Troncoso, and G. A. Cortés, “A new hybrid method for predicting univariate and multivariate time series based on pattern forecasting,” Information Sciences, Vol. 586, Pp. 611-627, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162580

I. Svetunkova. H. Chenb, and J. E. Boylan, “A new taxonomy for vector exponential smoothing and its application to seasonal time series,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 304, No. 3 Pp. 964-980, 1 February 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.040

N. A. Atussaliha and P. H. Darwis, "Metode Double Exponential Smoothing pada Sistem Peramalan," ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, Vol. 3, Pp.183-190, Desember 2020. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v12i3.607.183-190

G. Moiseev, “Forecasting oil tanker shipping market in crisis periods: Exponential smoothing model application,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.37, No. 3, Pp. 239-244, September 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.06.002

J. F. R. Sanchez and L. M. Menezes, “Structural combination of seasonal exponential smoothing forecasts applied to load forecasting,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 275, No.3, Pp. 916–924, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.013

D. Febrian, S. I. A. Idrus, and D. A. J. Nainggolan, “The Comparison of Double Moving Average and Double Exponential Smoothing Methods in Forecasting the Number of Foreign Tourists Coming to North Sumatera,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser, Vol,1462, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012046

D. Guleryuz, “Forecasting outbreak of COVID-19 in Turkey; Comparison of Box–Jenkins, Brown’s exponential smoothing and long short-term memory models,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol.149, Pp. 927-935, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.032

K. Talordphop, S. Sukparungsee, and Y. Areepong, “On designing new mixed modified exponentially weighted moving average - exponentially weighted moving average control chart,” Results in Engineering,18,101152, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.

Q. Shao, A. Aldhafeeri, S. Qiu, and S. Khuder, “A multiplicative Holt–Winters model and autoregressive moving-average for hyponatremia mortality rates,” Healthcare Analytics, Vol. 4,100262, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2023.

R. Taboran, S. Sukparungsee, and Y. Areepong, “Mixed moving average-exponentially weighted moving average control charts for monitoring of parameter change,” in: Proceeding of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Pp.13–15. 2019.

M. Melikoglu, and Z. K. Menekse, “Forecasting Turkey's cattle and sheep manure based biomethane potentials till 2026,” Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol.132, 105440, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105440

M. Ordu, and Y. Zengin, “A comparative forecasting approach to forecast animal production: A case of Turkey,” Livestock Studies, Vol. 60, No.1, Pp. 25-32, 2020. https://doi.org/10.46897/lahaed.719095

S. Gokulakrishnan, G. Senthil Kumar, A. Serma Saravana Pandian, J. Ramesh, P. Thilakar, L. Radhakrishnan, and A. R. Nanthini, “Time Series Modelling and Forecasting of Prices of Cattle Feed In Tamil Nadu,” IJVASR, Vol. 53, No.2, March - April 2024.

G. A. Ryu, A. Nasridinov, H. Rah, and K. Yoo, “Forecasts of the Amount Purchase Pork Meat by Using Structured and Unstructured Big Data,” Agriculture, Vol.10, No.1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10010021

P. Guerra, Uri, L. Mamani, Natalio, P. Durand, Manuel, Pierr, Manrique, Condori, E. G. Herreros, and Manuel, “Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) time-series model for milk production forecasting in pasture-based dairy cows in the Andean highlands,” PLoS ONE, Vol.18, 2023. https://doi./10.1371/journal.pone.0288849

E. Kasatkina, D. Vavilova, and R. Faizullin, “Development of econometric models to forecast indicators of the livestock industry,” E3S Web of Conferences, Vol.548, 03002, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454803002

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Agus Eko Minarno
Editorial Board
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License