Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 9, No. 3, August 2024
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 9, No. 3, August 2024

Issue Published : Aug 31, 2024
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Metaverse Adoption in Public Sector: A Bibliometric Analysis

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i3.1891
Adele Mailangkay
Bina Nusantara University
Darmawan Napitupulu
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Corresponding Author(s) : Adele Mailangkay

adele.mailangkay@binus.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 9, No. 3, August 2024
Article Published : Aug 30, 2024

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

The objective of this study is to map the landscape and knowledge structure of the public sector metaverse through bibliometric analysis. Following this, a descriptive overview of the current state of public sector research related to the metaverse, including the leading ten authors and sources, most relevant keywords, and primary research topics, will be presented. The selection of the Scopus database was based on its status as the largest repository of its kind and its provision of an extensive compilation of abstracts and citations for peer-reviewed articles, proceedings, and journals. The initial search yielded 369 documents from Scopus; after eliminating duplicate and irrelevant articles, 354 documents remained. The results demonstrate the substantial development of the metaverse in the public sector, with an annual growth rate of 14.89%. This indicates that the adoption of virtual technology and the metaverse is gaining importance in the public sector. Castronova ranks first in terms of the quantity of studies published, with five articles, followed by De Kool and Zhang. "Metaverse," "virtual reality," and "virtual world" are the most pertinent keywords. Due to the extensive research that has been conducted on these phrases, they represent fundamental concepts in the field. Additional frequently occurring terms include "social networking (online)," "interactive computer graphics," "government data processing," and "internet." These terms underscore the significance of governance, human factors, technology, and data in shaping the trajectory of digital government services. They also exemplify the interdisciplinary character of metaverse applications within the public sector.

Keywords

Metaverse Public Sector Vosviewer Biblioshiny Bibliometric
Mailangkay, A., & Napitupulu, D. (2024). Metaverse Adoption in Public Sector: A Bibliometric Analysis . Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 9(3), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v9i3.1891
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 66, p. 102542, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
  2. S. E. Bibri, “The Metaverse as a Virtual Model of Platform Urbanism: Its Converging AIoT, XReality, Neurotech, and Nanobiotech and Their Applications, Challenges, and Risks,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1345–1384, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030065
  3. A. S. Al-Adwan and M. M. Al-Debei, “The determinants of Gen Z’s metaverse adoption decisions in higher education: Integrating UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness in IT,” Education and Information Technologies 2023 29:6, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 7413–7445, Aug. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1
  4. Z. Allam, A. Sharifi, S. E. Bibri, D. S. Jones, and J. Krogstie, “The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures,” Smart Cities, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 771–801, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040
  5. A. E. Ezugwu, A. K. Shukla, M. B. Agbaje, O. N. Oyelade, A. José-García, and J. O. Agushaka, “Automatic clustering algorithms: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of relevant literature,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 6247–6306, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05395-4
  6. A. Kumar, “A Bibliometric Study of Supply Chain Management,” Management Research and Practice, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2016.
  7. R. N. Broadus, “Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics,’” Scientometrics, vol. 12, no. 5–6, pp. 373–379, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
  8. N. A. Abdul Rahman, A. Ahmi, L. Jraisat, and A. Upadhyay, “Examining the trend of humanitarian supply chain studies: pre, during and post COVID-19 pandemic,” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 594–617, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2022-0012
  9. R. Pranckutė, “Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world,” Publications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
  10. A. Rejeb, J. G. Keogh, S. Zailani, H. Treiblmaier, and K. Rejeb, “Blockchain technology in the food industry: A review of potentials, challenges and future research directions,” Logistics, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 27, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4040027
  11. F. de Moya-Anegón et al., “Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach,” Scientometrics, vol. 73, pp. 53–78, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
  12. F. G. Montoya, A. Alcayde, R. Baños, and F. Manzano-Agugliaro, “A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 168–185, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.010
  13. A. Rejeb, K. Rejeb, and A. Appolloni, The landscape of public procurement research : a bibliometric analysis and topic modelling based on Scopus, vol. 23, no. 2. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2022-0031
  14. R. Zakaria et al., “Visualising and mapping a decade of literature on honey research: a bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020,” Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 359–368, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1898789
  15. N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of business research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  16. A. F. Van Raan, “Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping,” Bibliometrics Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance, vol. 87, pp. 17–28, 2014.
  17. M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  18. T. L. Gehl, “Mapping distributed interactive simulation network requirements onto broadband networks and services,” in Conference Record - International Conference on Communications, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1994.369004
  19. R. Reinhardt, I. Christodoulou, S. Gassó-Domingo, and B. A. García, “Towards sustainable business models for electric vehicle battery second use: A critical review,” Journal of environmental management, vol. 245, pp. 432–446, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.095
  20. W. Wider, L. Jiang, J. Lin, M. A. Fauzi, J. Li, and C. K. Chan, “Metaverse chronicles: a bibliometric analysis of its evolving landscape,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227825
  21. D. Shao, H. Mwangakala, F. Ishengoma, H. Mongi, C. Mambile, and F. Chali, “Sustenance of the digital transformations induced by the COVID-19 pandemic response: Lessons from Tanzanian public sector,” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 72, no. 6/7, pp. 700–713, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2021-0186
  22. H. Roshidul, M. S. Hossain, S. Z. Nayem, and M. M. Haque, “Developing a Sustainable Digital Transformation Framework for the Continuum of Primary to Tertiary Education in Bangladesh,” American Journal of Education and Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–129, 2022. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.1777
  23. D. Meskell, “New opportunities for involving citizens in the democratic process,” US General Services Administration newsletter, pp. 9–30, 2007.
  24. L.-H. Lee et al., “All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352
  25. K. F. Hew and W. S. Cheung, “Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x
  26. K. Starbird and L. Palen, “Working and sustaining the virtual" Disaster Desk",” in Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2013, pp. 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441832
  27. J. A. Muñoz-Cristóbal, A. Martínez-Monés, J. I. Asensio-Pérez, S. L. Villagrá-Sobrino, J. E. Hoyos-Torío, and Y. Dimitriadis, “City Ads: Embedding virtual worlds and augmented reality in everyday educational practice,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1670–1689, 2014.
  28. B. Rathore, “Virtual Consumerism: An Exploration of E-Commerce in the Metaverse,” International Journal of New Media Studies: International Peer Reviewed Scholarly Indexed Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 61–69, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.58972/eiprmj.v4i2y17.109
  29. B. Rathore, “Blockchain Revolutionizing Marketing: Harnessing the Power of Distributed Ledgers for Transparent, Secure, and Efficient Marketing Practices,” International Journal of New Media Studies: International Peer Reviewed Scholarly Indexed Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.58972/eiprmj.v6i2y19.123
Read More

References


Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 66, p. 102542, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542

S. E. Bibri, “The Metaverse as a Virtual Model of Platform Urbanism: Its Converging AIoT, XReality, Neurotech, and Nanobiotech and Their Applications, Challenges, and Risks,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1345–1384, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030065

A. S. Al-Adwan and M. M. Al-Debei, “The determinants of Gen Z’s metaverse adoption decisions in higher education: Integrating UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness in IT,” Education and Information Technologies 2023 29:6, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 7413–7445, Aug. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1

Z. Allam, A. Sharifi, S. E. Bibri, D. S. Jones, and J. Krogstie, “The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures,” Smart Cities, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 771–801, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040

A. E. Ezugwu, A. K. Shukla, M. B. Agbaje, O. N. Oyelade, A. José-García, and J. O. Agushaka, “Automatic clustering algorithms: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of relevant literature,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 6247–6306, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05395-4

A. Kumar, “A Bibliometric Study of Supply Chain Management,” Management Research and Practice, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2016.

R. N. Broadus, “Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics,’” Scientometrics, vol. 12, no. 5–6, pp. 373–379, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680

N. A. Abdul Rahman, A. Ahmi, L. Jraisat, and A. Upadhyay, “Examining the trend of humanitarian supply chain studies: pre, during and post COVID-19 pandemic,” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 594–617, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2022-0012

R. Pranckutė, “Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world,” Publications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

A. Rejeb, J. G. Keogh, S. Zailani, H. Treiblmaier, and K. Rejeb, “Blockchain technology in the food industry: A review of potentials, challenges and future research directions,” Logistics, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 27, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4040027

F. de Moya-Anegón et al., “Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach,” Scientometrics, vol. 73, pp. 53–78, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4

F. G. Montoya, A. Alcayde, R. Baños, and F. Manzano-Agugliaro, “A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 168–185, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.010

A. Rejeb, K. Rejeb, and A. Appolloni, The landscape of public procurement research : a bibliometric analysis and topic modelling based on Scopus, vol. 23, no. 2. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2022-0031

R. Zakaria et al., “Visualising and mapping a decade of literature on honey research: a bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020,” Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 359–368, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2021.1898789

N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of business research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

A. F. Van Raan, “Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping,” Bibliometrics Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance, vol. 87, pp. 17–28, 2014.

M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

T. L. Gehl, “Mapping distributed interactive simulation network requirements onto broadband networks and services,” in Conference Record - International Conference on Communications, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1994.369004

R. Reinhardt, I. Christodoulou, S. Gassó-Domingo, and B. A. García, “Towards sustainable business models for electric vehicle battery second use: A critical review,” Journal of environmental management, vol. 245, pp. 432–446, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.095

W. Wider, L. Jiang, J. Lin, M. A. Fauzi, J. Li, and C. K. Chan, “Metaverse chronicles: a bibliometric analysis of its evolving landscape,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227825

D. Shao, H. Mwangakala, F. Ishengoma, H. Mongi, C. Mambile, and F. Chali, “Sustenance of the digital transformations induced by the COVID-19 pandemic response: Lessons from Tanzanian public sector,” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 72, no. 6/7, pp. 700–713, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2021-0186

H. Roshidul, M. S. Hossain, S. Z. Nayem, and M. M. Haque, “Developing a Sustainable Digital Transformation Framework for the Continuum of Primary to Tertiary Education in Bangladesh,” American Journal of Education and Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–129, 2022. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.1777

D. Meskell, “New opportunities for involving citizens in the democratic process,” US General Services Administration newsletter, pp. 9–30, 2007.

L.-H. Lee et al., “All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05352

K. F. Hew and W. S. Cheung, “Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x

K. Starbird and L. Palen, “Working and sustaining the virtual" Disaster Desk",” in Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2013, pp. 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441832

J. A. Muñoz-Cristóbal, A. Martínez-Monés, J. I. Asensio-Pérez, S. L. Villagrá-Sobrino, J. E. Hoyos-Torío, and Y. Dimitriadis, “City Ads: Embedding virtual worlds and augmented reality in everyday educational practice,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1670–1689, 2014.

B. Rathore, “Virtual Consumerism: An Exploration of E-Commerce in the Metaverse,” International Journal of New Media Studies: International Peer Reviewed Scholarly Indexed Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 61–69, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.58972/eiprmj.v4i2y17.109

B. Rathore, “Blockchain Revolutionizing Marketing: Harnessing the Power of Distributed Ledgers for Transparent, Secure, and Efficient Marketing Practices,” International Journal of New Media Studies: International Peer Reviewed Scholarly Indexed Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.58972/eiprmj.v6i2y19.123

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 8 Download : 1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Agus Eko Minarno
Editorial Board
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License