Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7, No. 4, November 2022
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 7, No. 4, November 2022

Issue Published : Nov 30, 2022
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Adoption of Mobile Learning at Universities Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v7i4.1522
Misbahul Aziz
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Edwin Pramana
Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya
Hartarto Junaedi
Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya

Corresponding Author(s) : Misbahul Aziz

msbhlaziz@gmail.com

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 7, No. 4, November 2022
Article Published : Nov 30, 2022

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

This study aims to contribute to the proof of factors likely to determine the success of M-learning adoption based on previous research.  This is done because there are many different theoretical models proposed.  However, there is not yet a model that can be generally accepted as an established theoretical model for the adoption of M-learning in universities.  This research is expected to make a significant contribution to the development of a better theoretical understanding of the determinants that influence the adoption of M-learning using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).  To collect the data, researchers distributed questionnaires to respondents using google forms.  Forms are distributed via WhatsApp and Telegram.  The data used was 515 M-learning users.  Theoretical model research was carried out with Structural Equation Model (SEM) analysis, then SPSS and Amos as support for analysis.  There are six factors that determine the results of acceptance of M-leaning adoption in this study, namely Social Influence, Perceived Enjoyment, Facilitating Condition, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use.  The five factors that show positive and significant relationships are Social Influence, Perceived Enjoyment, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use.  Perceived Usefulness has the first strongest positive and significant value, and then Social Influence has the second strongest value.  Each factor has a medium influence value on Behavioral Intention.  That factor is the most influential in the application of M-learning in universities.

Keywords

Mobile Learning Technology Acceptance Model Behavioral Intention
Aziz, M., Pramana, E., & Junaedi, H. (2022). Adoption of Mobile Learning at Universities Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model . Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v7i4.1522
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. S. Alghazi, S. Y. Wong, A. Kamsin, E. Yadegaridehkordi, and L. Shuib, “Towards sustainable mobile learning: A brief review of the factors influencing acceptance of the use of mobile phones as learning tools,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410527.
  2. C. Buabeng-Andoh, “Exploring University students’ intention to use mobile learning: A research model approach,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 241–256, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10267-4.
  3. E. Pramana, “Determinants of the adoption of mobile learning systems among university students in Indonesia,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 17, pp. 365–398, 2018, doi: 10.28945/4119.
  4. Q. N. Naveed, M. M. Alam, and N. Tairan, “Structural equation modeling for mobile learning acceptance by university students: An empirical study,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1–20, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12208618.
  5. A. Aytekin, H. Özköse, and A. Ayaz, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in mobile learning adoption : Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” COLLNET J. Sci. Inf. Manag., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–116, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09737766.2021.2007037.
  6. A. Chelvarayan, J. E. Chee, S. F. Yeo, and H. Hashim, “STUDENT’S PERCEPTION ON MOBILE LEARNING: THE INFLUENCING FACTORS,” Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Couns., vol. 5, no. 37, pp. 01–09, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35631/ijepc.537001.
  7. A. M. Al‐rahmi, W. M. Al‐rahmi, U. Alturki, A. Aldraiweesh, S. Almutairy, and A. S. Al‐adwan, “Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13147893.
  8. M. N. Masrek and I. Samadi, “Determinants of mobile learning adoption in higher education setting,” Asian J. Sci. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 60–69, 2017, doi: 10.3923/ajsr.2017.60.69.
  9. D. Mutambara and A. Bayaga, “Predicting Rural Stem Teachers’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning in the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 14–29, 2020, doi: 10.36615/jcpmi.v10i2.404.
  10. S. Shukla, “M-learning adoption of management students’: A case of India,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 279–310, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10271-8.
  11. G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192–222, 1991.
  12. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977.
  13. D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” Source MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 1995.
  14. Y. U. Huan, X. Li, M. Aydeniz, and T. Wyatt, “Mobile Learning Adoption: An Empirical Investigation for Engineering Education*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1081–1091, 2015.
  15. F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Accep,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
  16. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” Source MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
  17. Y. S. Wang, M. C. Wu, and H. Y. Wang, “Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 92–118, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
  18. I. Ajzen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.
  19. G. D. Israel, “Determining Sample Size 1 The Level Of Precision,” Univ. Florida, 1992.
  20. W. L. (William L. Neuman, Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2014.
  21. D. Straub, M.-C. Boudreau, and D. Gefen, “Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, 2004, doi: 10.17705/1cais.01324.
  22. D. George and P. Mallery, “SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update,” Bost. Allyn Bacon, 2003.
  23. R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. 2016.
  24. J. . & C. P. Cohen, “Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,” 1983.
  25. Neil J Salkind, Encyclopedia of research design, vol. 1–0. 2010.
  26. M. E. Sobel, “Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models,” Sociol. Methodol., vol. 16, pp. 159–186, 1986, doi: 10.2307/270922.
  27. Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). 1988.
  28. K. A. Bollen, Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
Read More

References


S. S. Alghazi, S. Y. Wong, A. Kamsin, E. Yadegaridehkordi, and L. Shuib, “Towards sustainable mobile learning: A brief review of the factors influencing acceptance of the use of mobile phones as learning tools,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410527.

C. Buabeng-Andoh, “Exploring University students’ intention to use mobile learning: A research model approach,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 241–256, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10267-4.

E. Pramana, “Determinants of the adoption of mobile learning systems among university students in Indonesia,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 17, pp. 365–398, 2018, doi: 10.28945/4119.

Q. N. Naveed, M. M. Alam, and N. Tairan, “Structural equation modeling for mobile learning acceptance by university students: An empirical study,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1–20, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12208618.

A. Aytekin, H. Özköse, and A. Ayaz, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in mobile learning adoption : Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” COLLNET J. Sci. Inf. Manag., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 75–116, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09737766.2021.2007037.

A. Chelvarayan, J. E. Chee, S. F. Yeo, and H. Hashim, “STUDENT’S PERCEPTION ON MOBILE LEARNING: THE INFLUENCING FACTORS,” Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Couns., vol. 5, no. 37, pp. 01–09, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35631/ijepc.537001.

A. M. Al‐rahmi, W. M. Al‐rahmi, U. Alturki, A. Aldraiweesh, S. Almutairy, and A. S. Al‐adwan, “Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13147893.

M. N. Masrek and I. Samadi, “Determinants of mobile learning adoption in higher education setting,” Asian J. Sci. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 60–69, 2017, doi: 10.3923/ajsr.2017.60.69.

D. Mutambara and A. Bayaga, “Predicting Rural Stem Teachers’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning in the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 14–29, 2020, doi: 10.36615/jcpmi.v10i2.404.

S. Shukla, “M-learning adoption of management students’: A case of India,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 279–310, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10271-8.

G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192–222, 1991.

A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977.

D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” Source MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 1995.

Y. U. Huan, X. Li, M. Aydeniz, and T. Wyatt, “Mobile Learning Adoption: An Empirical Investigation for Engineering Education*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1081–1091, 2015.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Accep,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” Source MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.

Y. S. Wang, M. C. Wu, and H. Y. Wang, “Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 92–118, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.

I. Ajzen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.

G. D. Israel, “Determining Sample Size 1 The Level Of Precision,” Univ. Florida, 1992.

W. L. (William L. Neuman, Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2014.

D. Straub, M.-C. Boudreau, and D. Gefen, “Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, 2004, doi: 10.17705/1cais.01324.

D. George and P. Mallery, “SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update,” Bost. Allyn Bacon, 2003.

R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. 2016.

J. . & C. P. Cohen, “Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,” 1983.

Neil J Salkind, Encyclopedia of research design, vol. 1–0. 2010.

M. E. Sobel, “Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models,” Sociol. Methodol., vol. 16, pp. 159–186, 1986, doi: 10.2307/270922.

Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). 1988.

K. A. Bollen, Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 12 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Agus Eko Minarno
Editorial Board
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License