Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7, No. 2, May 2022
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 7, No. 2, May 2022

Issue Published : Jun 21, 2022
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Performance Evaluation of 198 Village Governments using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v7i2.1393
Wridhasari Hayuningtyas
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Mauridhi Hery Purnomo
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Adhi Dharma Wibawa
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Corresponding Author(s) : Wridhasari Hayuningtyas

yuyun165@yahoo.com

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 7, No. 2, May 2022
Article Published : Jun 21, 2022

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Currently, volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) have become unavoidable problems. In addition, knowledge or information that is not managed properly can result in inappropriate decision-making processes within an organization. Business Intelligence conception is then becoming an essential view for converting unstructured data and information into a more actionable strategic plan that allows organizations to make competitive decisions. Village Government (VG) is the smallest organization in the Indonesian government system because VG implemented regulation and development programs in all areas of a national government. VG executes a series of tasks every year starting from planning, budgeting, administrating, executing, and reporting. However, the important role of VG in the development of a country brings also some drawbacks such as corruption and other domino effects. Several factors have been identified that cause those problems such as lack of capabilities in managing village organization and human resources quality. Monitoring and evaluation regarding those VG performances normally have been done each year. However, measurable evaluation standard for VG performance until recently has not been determined nationally. This study is intended to make a comprehensive standard of village government performance assessment through a Good Governance Framework approach. This study involved 198 villages from Madiun Regency as a case study. Seventy-four measured parameters were proposed to evaluate VG performance mapping. Fuzzy TOPSIS is implemented to rank those 198 villages into 4 groups of VG performance levels. The fuzzy TOPSIS classification result has been validated by using manual scoring and the accuracy reached 86,4%.

Keywords

Performance Measurement Good Governance Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS
Hayuningtyas, W., Purnomo, M. H., & Adhi Dharma Wibawa. (2022). Performance Evaluation of 198 Village Governments using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v7i2.1393
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Evangelos Triantaphyllou. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Louisiana State University. ISBN 978-1-4757-3157-6. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6, 2000.
  2. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng et al. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742, 2011.
  3. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 12 of 2007 concerning Guidelines for Compilation and Utilization of Village and Sub-District Profile Data.
  4. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.
  5. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 114 of 2014 concerning Village Development Guidelines.
  6. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 81 of 2015 concerning Evaluation of Village and Sub-District Developments.
  7. Charles G. Kamau et al. Efficacy of Monitoring and Evaluation Function in Achieving Project Success in Kenya: A Conceptual 18 Framework. Science Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 82-94. DOI: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.14, 2015.
  8. Sorin Nadaban et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View. Procedia Computer Science 91 (2016) 823 – 831. Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2016), 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
  9. Minister of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning the Index of Developing Villages.
  10. Houssine Tlig et al. A TOPSIS Method Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values: A Case Study of North African Airports. Journal of Management Science Letters, 2017. DOI:10.5267/j.msl.2017.4.002.
  11. Regent of Madiun Regulation Number 78 of 2018 Concerning Guidelines for Village Financial Management.
  12. Dyah Budiastuti et al. Validity dan Reliability of Research. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media. ISBN: 978-602-318, 2018.
  13. Emad Abu-Shanab et al. The Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on E-Government Success: a Proposed Framework Tested. Journal of Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2018. DOI 10.1108/TG-02-2018-0016
  14. Jingjing Du et al. Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in Strategic Management under a “VUCA” Environment: Evidence from High Tech Companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.03.003.
  15. Rathin B., et al. A Good Governance Framework For Urban Management. Journal of Urban Management, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.009.
  16. Manindra Rajak et al. Evaluation and Selection of Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Technology in Society, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101186.
  17. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi et al. Factors Influencing Medical Tourism Adoption in Malaysia: A DEMATEL Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. International Journal of Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005.
  18. Ralf Müller. Governance, Governmentality and Project Performance: The Role of Sovereignty. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 2019. DOI: 10.12821/ijispm070201.
  19. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 of 2019 concerning Amendment of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 137 of 2017 concerning The Code and Data of Government Administration Areas.
  20. Nova Rijati et al. Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Classification of Entrepreneurial Potential Based on Theory of Planned Behavior. National Journal of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, 2020. DOI:10.22146/jnteti.v9i1.118.
  21. Ayu Tiara Suci et al. TOPSIS Fuzzy Method on Employee Recruitment Decision Making in PT. Global Solutions Enterprise. National Journal of Industrial Technology, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol26.iss1.art2.
  22. Nova Rijati et al. A Decision Making and Clustering Method Integration based on the Theory of Planned Behavior for Student Entrepreneurial Potential Mapping in Indonesia. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2020. DOI: 10.22266/ijies2020.0831.12.
  23. Mohamed El Alaoui. Fuzzy TOPSIS Logic, Approaches, and Case Studies. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 2021. DOI:10.1201/9781003168416.
  24. Ewa Roszkowska et al. Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS as a Method for Assessing Socioeconomic Phenomena on the Basis of Survey Data. Journal Entropy, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050563.
  25. Lanndon Ocampo et al. Classifying The Degree of Exposure of Customers to COVID-19 in The Restaurant Industry: A Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Extension of The TOPSIS-Sort. Journal of Applied Soft Computing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107906.
  26. Yanfang Niu. Organizational Business Intelligence and Decision Making using Big Data Analytics. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102725.
  27. Wana Alamsyah. Corruption Case Enforcement Performance in 2020. Indonesia Corruption Watch Article, 2021.
Read More

References


Evangelos Triantaphyllou. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Louisiana State University. ISBN 978-1-4757-3157-6. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6, 2000.

Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng et al. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742, 2011.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 12 of 2007 concerning Guidelines for Compilation and Utilization of Village and Sub-District Profile Data.

Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 114 of 2014 concerning Village Development Guidelines.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 81 of 2015 concerning Evaluation of Village and Sub-District Developments.

Charles G. Kamau et al. Efficacy of Monitoring and Evaluation Function in Achieving Project Success in Kenya: A Conceptual 18 Framework. Science Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 82-94. DOI: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.14, 2015.

Sorin Nadaban et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View. Procedia Computer Science 91 (2016) 823 – 831. Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2016), 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088

Minister of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning the Index of Developing Villages.

Houssine Tlig et al. A TOPSIS Method Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values: A Case Study of North African Airports. Journal of Management Science Letters, 2017. DOI:10.5267/j.msl.2017.4.002.

Regent of Madiun Regulation Number 78 of 2018 Concerning Guidelines for Village Financial Management.

Dyah Budiastuti et al. Validity dan Reliability of Research. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media. ISBN: 978-602-318, 2018.

Emad Abu-Shanab et al. The Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on E-Government Success: a Proposed Framework Tested. Journal of Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2018. DOI 10.1108/TG-02-2018-0016

Jingjing Du et al. Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in Strategic Management under a “VUCA” Environment: Evidence from High Tech Companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.03.003.

Rathin B., et al. A Good Governance Framework For Urban Management. Journal of Urban Management, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.009.

Manindra Rajak et al. Evaluation and Selection of Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Technology in Society, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101186.

Mehrbakhsh Nilashi et al. Factors Influencing Medical Tourism Adoption in Malaysia: A DEMATEL Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. International Journal of Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005.

Ralf Müller. Governance, Governmentality and Project Performance: The Role of Sovereignty. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 2019. DOI: 10.12821/ijispm070201.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 of 2019 concerning Amendment of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 137 of 2017 concerning The Code and Data of Government Administration Areas.

Nova Rijati et al. Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Classification of Entrepreneurial Potential Based on Theory of Planned Behavior. National Journal of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, 2020. DOI:10.22146/jnteti.v9i1.118.

Ayu Tiara Suci et al. TOPSIS Fuzzy Method on Employee Recruitment Decision Making in PT. Global Solutions Enterprise. National Journal of Industrial Technology, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol26.iss1.art2.

Nova Rijati et al. A Decision Making and Clustering Method Integration based on the Theory of Planned Behavior for Student Entrepreneurial Potential Mapping in Indonesia. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2020. DOI: 10.22266/ijies2020.0831.12.

Mohamed El Alaoui. Fuzzy TOPSIS Logic, Approaches, and Case Studies. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 2021. DOI:10.1201/9781003168416.

Ewa Roszkowska et al. Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS as a Method for Assessing Socioeconomic Phenomena on the Basis of Survey Data. Journal Entropy, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050563.

Lanndon Ocampo et al. Classifying The Degree of Exposure of Customers to COVID-19 in The Restaurant Industry: A Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Extension of The TOPSIS-Sort. Journal of Applied Soft Computing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107906.

Yanfang Niu. Organizational Business Intelligence and Decision Making using Big Data Analytics. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102725.

Wana Alamsyah. Corruption Case Enforcement Performance in 2020. Indonesia Corruption Watch Article, 2021.

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 46 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgment
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Amrul Faruq
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Agus Eko Minarno
Editorial Board
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License