Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Join As Reviewer
  • Info
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2021
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2021

Issue Published : May 31, 2021
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Developing an Instrument to Measure Information Assurance Implementation for eGovernment using Goal Question Metric Approach

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v6i2.1200
Rio Guntur Utomo
Telkom University
Gary Wills
University of Southampton
Robert Walters
University of Southampton

Corresponding Author(s) : Rio Guntur Utomo

riogunturutomo@telkomuniversity.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2021
Article Published : May 31, 2021

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

The eGovernment initiative is aimed to improve government services to the public by improving the quality and availability of services that can be accessed regardless of time and place. Consequently, the services must always be available at any time, and any threat to the information and systems should receive attention to ensure business continuity in the event of an incident. Therefore, in implementing eGovernment, information assurance (IA) must be considered. To determine the extent to which IA implementation status to protect eGovernment services in Indonesia, it is necessary to measure the implementation using an instrument. The measurement instrument was developed using the Goal Question Metric (GQM) approach. The developed instrument was then used in a case study to test its effectiveness in measuring the IA implementation. From the results of the case study, it can be concluded that the IA measurement instrument for eGovernment was proven to be effective within Indonesian context.


 

Keywords

Information Assurance eGovernment Goal Question Metric
Utomo, R. G., Wills, G., & Walters, R. (2021). Developing an Instrument to Measure Information Assurance Implementation for eGovernment using Goal Question Metric Approach. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v6i2.1200
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Schnoll, H. (2015). E-Government. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
  2. Muñoz, L., & Bolívar, M. (2018). International E-Government Development: Policy, Implementation and Best Practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1
  3. Indrajit, R. E. (2016). Electronic government.
  4. Medeni, İ., & Balcı, A. (2018). E-merging for E-government: Citizen Orientation, Policy Making, Local Governance and ICT Use. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  5. Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2015). e-Government - Strategy Process Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_88
  6. Trotta, A. (2017). Advances in E-Governance: Theory and Application of Technological Initiatives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315181530
  7. Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. EJISDC The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
  8. Yanqing, G. (2010). E-government: Definition, goals, benefits and risks. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, MASS 2010, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576557
  9. UNITED NATIONS. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. New York, 270. https://doi.org/10.18356/d54b9179-en
  10. Rathmell, A., Daman, S., O’Brien, K., & Anhal, A. (2004). Engaging the Board Corporate Governance and Information Assurance. In Information Assurance Advisory Council (IAAC).
  11. Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001
  12. Basu, S. (2004). E‐government and developing countries: an overview. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779
  13. ISO/IEC. (2013). ISO/IEC 27002:2013. Iec, 2013, 90.
  14. Hibbard, E. A. (2009). Introduction to Information Assurance. In Storage Networking Industry Association.
  15. Herrmann, D. (2019). A Practical Guide to Security Engineering and Information Assurance. Taylor & Francis Limited. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031492
  16. Willett, K. (2019). Information Assurance Architecture. Taylor & Francis Limited.
  17. Cherdantseva, Y., & Hilton, J. (2013). A Reference Model of Information Assurance & Security. Proceedings of the 8th ARES Conference 2013 (ARES 2013), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2013.72
  18. Riggs, C. (2019). Network Perimeter Security: Building Defense In-Depth. Auerbach Publishers, Incorporated.
  19. Rathmell, A., Daman, S., O’Brien, K., & Anhal, A. (2004). Engaging the Board Corporate Governance and Information Assurance. In Information Assurance Advisory Council (IAAC).
  20. Utomo, R. G., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2018). Factors affecting the implementation of information assurance for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2017, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356388
  21. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The Goal, Metric, and Question Approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471028959.sof142
  22. Yin, R. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  23. Utomo, R. G., Wills, G., & Walters, R. (2020). A framework for factors influencing the implementation of information assurance for e-Government in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(3), 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.3.9186
  24. Utomo, R.G., Wills, G. B., & Walters, R. J. (2018). Towards Confirming an Information Assurance Framework for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), (3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSS.2018.8550010
  25. Utomo, R. G., Wills, G. B., & Walters, R. J. (2018). Investigating Factors in Information Assurance Implementation: Towards Developing an Information Assurance Framework for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, ICITSI 2018 - Proceedings, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8695932
Read More

References


Schnoll, H. (2015). E-Government. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Muñoz, L., & Bolívar, M. (2018). International E-Government Development: Policy, Implementation and Best Practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1

Indrajit, R. E. (2016). Electronic government.

Medeni, İ., & Balcı, A. (2018). E-merging for E-government: Citizen Orientation, Policy Making, Local Governance and ICT Use. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2015). e-Government - Strategy Process Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_88

Trotta, A. (2017). Advances in E-Governance: Theory and Application of Technological Initiatives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315181530

Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. EJISDC The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x

Yanqing, G. (2010). E-government: Definition, goals, benefits and risks. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, MASS 2010, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576557

UNITED NATIONS. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. New York, 270. https://doi.org/10.18356/d54b9179-en

Rathmell, A., Daman, S., O’Brien, K., & Anhal, A. (2004). Engaging the Board Corporate Governance and Information Assurance. In Information Assurance Advisory Council (IAAC).

Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001

Basu, S. (2004). E‐government and developing countries: an overview. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779

ISO/IEC. (2013). ISO/IEC 27002:2013. Iec, 2013, 90.

Hibbard, E. A. (2009). Introduction to Information Assurance. In Storage Networking Industry Association.

Herrmann, D. (2019). A Practical Guide to Security Engineering and Information Assurance. Taylor & Francis Limited. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031492

Willett, K. (2019). Information Assurance Architecture. Taylor & Francis Limited.

Cherdantseva, Y., & Hilton, J. (2013). A Reference Model of Information Assurance & Security. Proceedings of the 8th ARES Conference 2013 (ARES 2013), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2013.72

Riggs, C. (2019). Network Perimeter Security: Building Defense In-Depth. Auerbach Publishers, Incorporated.

Rathmell, A., Daman, S., O’Brien, K., & Anhal, A. (2004). Engaging the Board Corporate Governance and Information Assurance. In Information Assurance Advisory Council (IAAC).

Utomo, R. G., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2018). Factors affecting the implementation of information assurance for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2017 12th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2017, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICITST.2017.8356388

Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The Goal, Metric, and Question Approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471028959.sof142

Yin, R. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Utomo, R. G., Wills, G., & Walters, R. (2020). A framework for factors influencing the implementation of information assurance for e-Government in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(3), 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.3.9186

Utomo, R.G., Wills, G. B., & Walters, R. J. (2018). Towards Confirming an Information Assurance Framework for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), (3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSS.2018.8550010

Utomo, R. G., Wills, G. B., & Walters, R. J. (2018). Investigating Factors in Information Assurance Implementation: Towards Developing an Information Assurance Framework for eGovernment in Indonesia. 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, ICITSI 2018 - Proceedings, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8695932

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 254 Download : 227

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Quick Link

  • Author Guidelines
  • Download Manuscript Template
  • Peer Review Process
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewer Acknowledgement
  • Aim and Scope
  • Publication Ethics
  • Licensing Term
  • Copyright Notice
  • Open Access Policy
  • Important Dates
  • Author Fees
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • Archiving Policy
  • Scopus Citation Analysis
  • Statistic
  • Article Withdrawal

Meet Our Editorial Team

Ir. Amrul Faruq, M.Eng., Ph.D
Editor in Chief
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar Scopus
Agus Eko Minarno
Editorial Board
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Google Scholar  Scopus
Hanung Adi Nugroho
Editorial Board
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Google Scholar Scopus
Roman Voliansky
Editorial Board
Dniprovsky State Technical University, Ukraine
Google Scholar Scopus
Read More
 

KINETIK: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
eISSN : 2503-2267
pISSN : 2503-2259


Address

Program Studi Elektro dan Informatika

Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Jl. Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang

Phone 0341-464318 EXT 247

Contact Info

Principal Contact

Amrul Faruq
Phone: +62 812-9398-6539
Email: faruq@umm.ac.id

Support Contact

Fauzi Dwi Setiawan Sumadi
Phone: +62 815-1145-6946
Email: fauzisumadi@umm.ac.id

© 2020 KINETIK, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License