Issue

Vol. 5, No. 4, November 2020

Cyber Security Analysis of Academic Services based on Domain Delivery Services and Support using Indonesian E-Government Ratings (PEGI)

https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v5i4.1083
Imam Riadi
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Iwan Tti Riyadi Yanto
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Eko Handoyo
Universitas Muhammadiyah Lamongan

Corresponding Author(s) : Imam Riadi

Imam.riadi@is.uad.ac.id

Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, Vol. 5, No. 4, November 2020

Abstract

Safe academic services are the most important part of universities. The security of academic services is very important to maintain information optimally and safely. Along with the development of technology, academic information services are often misused by some irresponsible parties that can cause threats. To prevent these things from happening, it is necessary to know the extent of governance of higher education academic information system security by evaluating. So the research was conducted to determine the maturity of the security of Higher Education academic information service security by using the COBIT 5 framework in the DSS05 domain. The DSS05 domain in COBIT 5 is a good framework for use in implementing and evaluating the security of academic information services. Meanwhile, to determine the achievement of the evaluation of the security level of academic information systems, the Indonesian e-government ranking (PEGI) method is required. The combination of the COBIT 5 framework in the DSS05 domain using the PEGI method in academic information security service is able to provide a level of achievement in the form of Customer Value. The results of the COBIT 5 framework analysis of the DSS05 domain using the PEGI method get a score of 3.50 so that the quality of academic information service security evaluation achievement is at a very good level. At this level, universities are increasingly open to technological development. Higher education has applied the concept of quantification in every process, and has always been monitored and controlled for its performance in the security of academic information systems.

Keywords

COBIT 5 Maturity PEGI Safety
Riadi, I., Riyadi Yanto, I. T., & Handoyo, E. (2020). Cyber Security Analysis of Academic Services based on Domain Delivery Services and Support using Indonesian E-Government Ratings (PEGI). Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 5(4), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v5i4.1083
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. R. Umar, I. Riadi, and E. Handoyo, “Analysis of Information Technology Governance Using the COBIT 5 Framework in Domain Delivery, Service, And Support (DSS),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun. - Semant. 2017 Anal., pp. 41–48, 2017.
  2. L. F. Fathoni et al., “Application Information System Based Health,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2016.
  3. I. Muslimin, S. P. Hadi, and E. Nugroho, “An Evaluation Model Using Perceived User Technology Organization Fit Variable for Evaluating the Success of Information Systems,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 86–94, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v4i2.12012
  4. I. Riadi, A. Yudhana, M. Caesar, and F. Putra, “Forensic Tool Comparison on Instagram Digital Evidence Based on Android with The NIST Method,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 235–247, 2018. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v5i2.16545
  5. I. Riadi and M. E. Rauli, “Live forensics analysis of line app on proprietary operating system,” vol. 4, no. 4, 2019. https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v4i4.850
  6. E. Kurniawan, “Security Level Analysis Of Academic Information Systems Based On Standard Iso 27002 : 2013 USING SSE-CMM,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur., vol. 16, no. January, 2018. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v2i1.11830
  7. I. Riadi, S. Sunardi, and E. Handoyo, “Security Analysis of Grr Rapid Response Network using COBIT 5 Framework,” Lontar Komput. J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29, 2019. https://doi.org/10.24843/LKJITI.2019.v10.i01.p04
  8. P. O. Rahmanda, R. Arifudin, and M. A. Muslim, “Implementation of Analytic Network Process Method on Decision Support System of Determination of Scholarship Recipient at House of Lazis Charity UNNES,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v4i2.11852
  9. M. Sumagita, I. Riadi, U. A. Dahlan, K. Yogyakarta, and D. I. Yogyakarta, “Analysis of Secure Hash Algorithm ( SHA ) 512 for Encryption Process on Web Based Application,” vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 373–381, 2018.
  10. E. Hicham, B. Boulafdour, M. Makoudi, and B. Regragui, “Information security, 4TH wave,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2012.
  11. I. Riadi, Y. Iwan, and E. Handoyo, “Analysis of academic service cybersecurity in university based on framework COBIT 5 using CMMI Analysis of academic service cybersecurity in university based on framework COBIT 5 using CMMI,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/821/1/012003
  12. F. Latifi and H. Zarrabi, “A COBIT5 Framework for IoT Risk Management,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 170, no. 8, pp. 40–43, 2017.
  13. R. Umar, I. Riadi, and E. Handoyo, “Analysis Security of SIA Based DSS05 on COBIT 5 Using Capability Maturity Model Integration ( CMMI ),” Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2019. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v6i2.17387
  14. O. K. Sulaiman, “Network Security System Analysis With Switch Port Security” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2016. https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v1i1.4036
  15. R. Fadhlurrahman, M. C. Saputra, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluation of the Implementation of E-government in Batu City Government Using Indonesia's E-government Rating Framework ( PeGI ),” vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 5977–5982, 2018.
  16. J. F. Andry, “Audit of IT Governance Based on COBIT 5 Assessments : A Case Study,” TEKNOSI, vol. 02, no. May, 2017. https://doi.org/10.25077/TEKNOSI.v2i2.2016.27-34
  17. A. Yudhana et al., “Designing Information Systems Using Enterprise Architecture Planning ( Studi Kasus Pada Kecamatan di Kota Samarinda ),” khazanah Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–123, 2018. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v4i2.7039
  18. A. Fitriansyah, H. Budiarto, and J. Santoso, “Indonesian E-Government Rating Method (PeGI) for Information Technology Governance Audits,” Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. Indones., pp. 2–4, 2013.
  19. P. Rahayu and D. I. Sensuse, “Assessment of e-Government Implementation in the Ministry of Education and Culture PUSTEKOM based on the PEGI method,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 02, pp. 139–145, 2017. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol7iss2pp139-145
  20. Rusydi Umar, I. Riadi, and E. Handoyo, “A Analysis of Information Systems Security Based on COBIT 5 Framework Using Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI),” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 01, pp. 47–54, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol9iss1pp47-54
Read More

Author Biographies

Imam Riadi, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Department of Information System
Iwan Tti Riyadi Yanto, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Department of Information System
Eko Handoyo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Lamongan
Departmen of Computer Engineering
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 398 Download : 159

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.